Home Digital Drive

Upsamplers, DACs, jitter, shakes and analogue withdrawals, this is it.

Re: Your player already has fairly low jitter measurements

<< the Miller analyser is (I believe) based on Julian Dunn's J-test method. The problem is that this does not actually measure jitter, what it's measuring are artefacts associated with perturbing a sine wave with a 1-bit amplitude square wave. >>

Yes, I believe that the Miller analyzer does use the "J-test" method. This is actually a large-amplitude *square* wave that is overlaid with a 1-bit amplitude square wave of a different frequency. One big problem with this method is that it was actually developed to stimulate the worst-case scenario of jitter introduced by an S/PDIF (or AES-EBU) link. It therefore has virtually no application whatsoever to one-box players, as they don't use the bi-phase mark encoding that is susceptible to the signal used on the "J-test".

<< What I do know from examining a Sony XA777ES ... is that there seems to have been quite a lot of attention paid to reduce the effects caused by logic induced modulation, which is a major source of jitter, certainly more so than on a typical universal player. >>

While this may be true of a "typical" universal player, I can assure you that there are certainly examples of universal players tested by Stereophile where this was *not* true. And yet the measured jitter numbers do not correlate well with what would be expected by comparing the designs. I believe that this is a flaw with the test (or its implementation), and not the result of faulty analysis. We already have one data point that shows 100% variation in the results of the Stereophile test on the exact same machine.


This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
  Signature Sound   [ Signature Sound Lounge ]


Follow Ups Full Thread
Follow Ups


You can not post to an archived thread.