Home Digital Drive

Upsamplers, DACs, jitter, shakes and analogue withdrawals, this is it.

Re: You might be interested in this ...

"Generate a 16-bit test waveform (mine was two sine waves sine-modulated in frequency and amplitude) in 44.1, upsample to 96, then downsample to 44.1."

If you did so in 16 bit then indeed it is no wonder you got bad results. Now please try again in 32 bit.

"I am happy to be proved wrong, but I suspect it's not as feasible as you think."

At least one such has been inexistence for more than four years now. I think this proves feasibility.
As for building one myself, I'd love to. Who provides the funding?


But I agree we've had a disconnect re speed/real-time/batch processing. I don't care a jot about real-time processing, especially not SRC. This indeed deviates somewhat from the thread's beginning, but then, the distinction real-time <> not-real-time has nothing to do with the core of the problem: how to do SRC properly.




bring back dynamic range


This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
  McShane Design  


Follow Ups Full Thread
Follow Ups


You can not post to an archived thread.