In Reply to: I'm talking about SSRC not oversampling.... posted by Ted Smith on February 24, 2007 at 18:45:30:
As long as the output sample rate is higher than the input sample rate.You can call a conversion from 44.1 and 88.2 "sample rate conversion", "oversampling", or "upsampling". But if "zero-stuffing" is done in any such conversion instead of interpolation, it's just not going to sound right.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- They're One and the Same!!!! - Todd Krieger 19:10:58 02/24/07 (15)
- Wrong, zero stuffing and filtering do exactly the right thing - Ted Smith 02:22:38 02/25/07 (9)
- The Problem is Context and Confusion..... - Todd Krieger 11:58:45 02/25/07 (8)
- Re: The Problem is Context and Confusion..... - Ted Smith 14:04:16 02/25/07 (0)
- And Most-Importantly..... - Todd Krieger 12:11:30 02/25/07 (6)
- Re: And Most-Importantly..... - Ted Smith 13:55:47 02/25/07 (5)
- I can see why he drove real_jj mad :-) (nt) - Christine Tham 13:59:36 02/25/07 (4)
- Yep :-) - Ted Smith 14:07:26 02/25/07 (3)
- Including me, I presume? (nt) - Christine Tham 14:26:24 02/25/07 (2)
- Hmmm, I don't remember :) [nt] - Ted Smith 14:29:43 02/25/07 (1)
- Very diplomatic :-) - Christine Tham 14:35:01 02/25/07 (0)
- Believe it or not, zero-stuffing followed by a digital filter works - Christine Tham 21:50:17 02/24/07 (4)
- Now I See the Origin of the Confusion...... - Todd Krieger 00:45:25 02/25/07 (3)
- Wow. I think you are the one that is confused - Christine Tham 13:46:04 02/25/07 (2)
- Re: Wow. I think you are the one that is confused - Todd Krieger 15:13:01 02/25/07 (1)
- Yeah - I hear you :-) - Christine Tham 15:50:41 02/25/07 (0)