In Reply to: Nope posted by Ted Smith on February 24, 2007 at 18:02:46:
The question is what does the data look like *between* the upsampling (numerator) and downsampling (denominator)? I'm certain this is **not** trivial. It's very critical. The most critical part of such conversion.If zero-stuffing actually takes place in the upsampling (with no further calculation before downsampling) that intermediate data would be a zero signal with periodic spikes of the original signal. This is the signal that would then be downsampled. But the downsampling just cannot "restore" that signal.
I think the root of the misconception the notion of filtering and oversampling being two separable or different things. But they're not. The oversampling is where the filtering takes place. Oversampling *is* the digital filter.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Nope - Todd Krieger 18:28:37 02/24/07 (31)
- Oh, we could be zeroes, just for one day ... - Werner 00:26:29 02/26/07 (13)
- Re: Oh, we could be zeroes, just for one day ... - Todd Krieger 10:52:10 02/28/07 (11)
- You might be interested in this ... - Christine Tham 14:32:14 02/28/07 (10)
- Re: You might be interested in this ... - Werner 23:28:55 02/28/07 (9)
- Re: You might be interested in this ... - Christine Tham 23:48:47 02/28/07 (8)
- Re: You might be interested in this ... - Werner 03:18:08 03/01/07 (7)
- Re: You might be interested in this ... - Christine Tham 13:26:53 03/01/07 (6)
- Re: You might be interested in this ... - Werner 00:07:15 03/02/07 (5)
- Re: You might be interested in this ... - Christine Tham 16:58:49 03/02/07 (4)
- Re: You might be interested in this ... - Werner 00:31:32 03/05/07 (3)
- Re: You might be interested in this ... - Christine Tham 14:58:30 03/05/07 (2)
- Re: You might be interested in this ... - Werner 23:41:41 03/05/07 (1)
- Re: You might be interested in this ... - Christine Tham 14:10:30 03/06/07 (0)
- :) [nt] - Ted Smith 17:55:16 02/26/07 (0)
- I'm talking about SSRC not oversampling.... - Ted Smith 18:45:30 02/24/07 (16)
- They're One and the Same!!!! - Todd Krieger 19:10:58 02/24/07 (15)
- Wrong, zero stuffing and filtering do exactly the right thing - Ted Smith 02:22:38 02/25/07 (9)
- The Problem is Context and Confusion..... - Todd Krieger 11:58:45 02/25/07 (8)
- Re: The Problem is Context and Confusion..... - Ted Smith 14:04:16 02/25/07 (0)
- And Most-Importantly..... - Todd Krieger 12:11:30 02/25/07 (6)
- Re: And Most-Importantly..... - Ted Smith 13:55:47 02/25/07 (5)
- I can see why he drove real_jj mad :-) (nt) - Christine Tham 13:59:36 02/25/07 (4)
- Yep :-) - Ted Smith 14:07:26 02/25/07 (3)
- Including me, I presume? (nt) - Christine Tham 14:26:24 02/25/07 (2)
- Hmmm, I don't remember :) [nt] - Ted Smith 14:29:43 02/25/07 (1)
- Very diplomatic :-) - Christine Tham 14:35:01 02/25/07 (0)
- Believe it or not, zero-stuffing followed by a digital filter works - Christine Tham 21:50:17 02/24/07 (4)
- Now I See the Origin of the Confusion...... - Todd Krieger 00:45:25 02/25/07 (3)
- Wow. I think you are the one that is confused - Christine Tham 13:46:04 02/25/07 (2)
- Re: Wow. I think you are the one that is confused - Todd Krieger 15:13:01 02/25/07 (1)
- Yeah - I hear you :-) - Christine Tham 15:50:41 02/25/07 (0)