In Reply to: You didn't quote me correctly posted by Ted Smith on January 23, 2007 at 00:09:27:
...but rather on notional adherence to what I call conventional theory, what you call accepted engineering practice?That's interesting.
Here we have a device that, to my ears, in preliminary trials, way outperforms some much (much!) more expensive units that *do* conform, yet, "This unit costs too much based on the problems they've claimed to solve because there are simpler more effective solutions."
Huh!
Hey, did I quote you correctly here? The first time I, cut & pasted your words, but somehow managed to get it wrong. (!)
clark
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- "This unit costs too much based on the problems they've claimed to solve." So monetary worth is based not on performance - clarkjohnsen 09:20:54 01/23/07 (3)
- Re: "This unit costs too much based on the problems they've claimed to solve." So monetary worth is based not on perform - audioengr 12:56:57 02/03/07 (2)
- "It could have been produced at a much lower price." OK... - clarkjohnsen 19:48:11 02/03/07 (1)
- Re: "It could have been produced at a much lower price." OK... - audioengr 22:37:24 02/03/07 (0)