In Reply to: Internal clock = asynchronous sample rate convertor posted by Slider on January 18, 2007 at 14:27:49:
Wouldn't 24bit/88.2KHz "up-sampling" leave the original 16-bit words unmolested (padded to 24 bit), and simply interpose mean-values between each sample?You think a "free (96KHz) lunch" is to be had?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Internal clock = asynchronous sample rate convertor - Aleksunder 15:52:41 01/18/07 (1)
- He's using it in internal clock mode - Slider 17:00:02 01/18/07 (0)