In Reply to: Why would you choose to upsample to 96 instead of 88.2.... posted by Aleksunder on January 18, 2007 at 07:17:45:
Why would you pick 88.2 instead of 96K? Neither would be synchronous conversion.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Internal clock = asynchronous sample rate convertor - Slider 14:27:49 01/18/07 (2)
- Re: Internal clock = asynchronous sample rate convertor - Aleksunder 15:52:41 01/18/07 (1)
- He's using it in internal clock mode - Slider 17:00:02 01/18/07 (0)