|
Digital Drive Upsamplers, DACs, jitter, shakes and analogue withdrawals, this is it. |
|
|
|
Digital Drive Upsamplers, DACs, jitter, shakes and analogue withdrawals, this is it. |
|
In Reply to: REVIEW: Behringer SRC 2496 DAC Processors posted by Dynaudio_Rules on January 13, 2007 at 13:29:52:
...from (presumably) 44.1KHz?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Why would you choose to upsample to 96 instead of 88.2.... - Aleksunder 07:17:45 01/18/07 (13)
- I Just Recently Found Out..... - Todd Krieger 11:10:19 01/26/07 (0)
- Re: Why would you choose to upsample to 96 instead of 88.2.... - Dynaudio_Rules 16:57:50 01/18/07 (8)
- Re: Why would you choose to upsample to 96 instead of 88.2.... - Ted Smith 17:32:09 01/18/07 (7)
- Re: Why would you choose to upsample to 96 instead of 88.2.... - Todd Krieger 11:18:22 01/26/07 (1)
- Re: Why would you choose to upsample to 96 instead of 88.2.... - Ted Smith 12:52:16 01/26/07 (0)
- Re: Why would you choose to upsample to 96 instead of 88.2.... - Aleksunder 18:24:45 01/18/07 (3)
- Re: Why would you choose to upsample to 96 instead of 88.2.... - Dynaudio_Rules 19:50:06 01/18/07 (2)
- There's a big difference between SSRC and ASRC... - Ted Smith 20:40:40 01/18/07 (1)
- Really..... - Dynaudio_Rules 03:40:57 01/19/07 (0)
- Re: Why would you choose to upsample to 96 instead of 88.2.... - Dynaudio_Rules 18:24:35 01/18/07 (0)
- Internal clock = asynchronous sample rate convertor - Slider 14:27:49 01/18/07 (2)
- Re: Internal clock = asynchronous sample rate convertor - Aleksunder 15:52:41 01/18/07 (1)
- He's using it in internal clock mode - Slider 17:00:02 01/18/07 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
