In Reply to: Re: "most SACD titles are poorly recorded" ? Hardly posted by Ozzie on January 2, 2007 at 11:01:03:
HowdyI didn't miss your point, nor Todd's. I'm not sure that you understand my original point or the context in which I was trying to make it.
The context was a poster claiming "most SACD titles are poorly recorded" which is so clearly bogus that, as I said, I couldn't let it pass. I merely pointed out that I disagreed and since I had most SACDs and a fair collection of CDs it was clearly wrong in my case. I stand by that. The thing I know that almost certainly others don't is that my SACD and CD collections represent very different qualities of recordings (and performances, mastering, etc.) Anyway it doesn't matter if you get my point, it's not such a big deal anyway :)
-Ted
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Sorry that we are talking at cross purposes... - Ted Smith 11:44:58 01/02/07 (1)
- Re: Sorry that we are talking at cross purposes... - Ozzie 10:57:16 01/03/07 (0)