|
Digital Drive Upsamplers, DACs, jitter, shakes and analogue withdrawals, this is it. |
|
|
|
Digital Drive Upsamplers, DACs, jitter, shakes and analogue withdrawals, this is it. |
|
In Reply to: Re: "most SACD titles are poorly recorded" ? Hardly posted by Ozzie on December 27, 2006 at 09:17:23:
HowdyI understand your point, it's the same as Todd's point down lower and I disagree (at least in my case.) My SACDs (which are more than representative of SACDs in general) are better recorded than my CDs (which may or may not be representative of CDs as a whole, I have pretty strange taste :) Most of my CDs are not that greatly recorded and they are, in general, not dupes of my SACDs.
Even with your (and Todd's point of view) my original point stands: "most SACD titles are NOT poorly recorded".
-Ted
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: "most SACD titles are poorly recorded" ? Hardly - Ted Smith 15:13:49 12/27/06 (5)
- Re: "most SACD titles are poorly recorded" ? Hardly - Ozzie 11:01:03 01/02/07 (2)
- Sorry that we are talking at cross purposes... - Ted Smith 11:44:58 01/02/07 (1)
- Re: Sorry that we are talking at cross purposes... - Ozzie 10:57:16 01/03/07 (0)
- Re: "most SACD titles are poorly recorded" ? Hardly - jazz1 11:48:47 12/28/06 (1)
- Re: "most SACD titles are poorly recorded" ? Hardly - Ted Smith 12:23:43 12/28/06 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
