|
Digital Drive Upsamplers, DACs, jitter, shakes and analogue withdrawals, this is it. |
|
|
|
Digital Drive Upsamplers, DACs, jitter, shakes and analogue withdrawals, this is it. |
|
In Reply to: "most SACD titles are poorly recorded" ? Hardly posted by Ted Smith on December 23, 2006 at 12:22:43:
I couldn't let this pass. You are partly correct Ted. We both know that you meant:"As a whole the SACDs are much better recorded than my CDs."
should be this:
"As a whole the SACDs are much better mastered than my CDs."
I'll disregard the differences between mediums as we all are realistic of CDs limitations.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: "most SACD titles are poorly recorded" ? Hardly - Ozzie 10:01:58 12/26/06 (8)
- Re: "most SACD titles are poorly recorded" ? Hardly - Ted Smith 12:57:12 12/26/06 (7)
- Re: "most SACD titles are poorly recorded" ? Hardly - Ozzie 09:17:23 12/27/06 (6)
- Re: "most SACD titles are poorly recorded" ? Hardly - Ted Smith 15:13:49 12/27/06 (5)
- Re: "most SACD titles are poorly recorded" ? Hardly - Ozzie 11:01:03 01/02/07 (2)
- Sorry that we are talking at cross purposes... - Ted Smith 11:44:58 01/02/07 (1)
- Re: Sorry that we are talking at cross purposes... - Ozzie 10:57:16 01/03/07 (0)
- Re: "most SACD titles are poorly recorded" ? Hardly - jazz1 11:48:47 12/28/06 (1)
- Re: "most SACD titles are poorly recorded" ? Hardly - Ted Smith 12:23:43 12/28/06 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
