In Reply to: CD or CD/SACD ??? posted by JAIME ESPINOSA on December 21, 2006 at 19:10:33:
I woild suggest a very good CD-Playyer since most of us have more RBCD titles than SACDs. I own a Marantz SACD player and don't use it much since most SACD titles are poorly recorded and not worth the extra money.There are Non-Over-Sampling DACS and player that can enhance RVCD playback. Further, PHILIPS has a player (Europe only) that convets 44.1 PCM to DSD. Ultimately, it'your choice in the matter.
Good lick!
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: CD or CD/SACD ??? - l2sasm 09:51:54 12/23/06 (16)
- "most SACD titles are poorly recorded" ? Hardly - Ted Smith 12:22:43 12/23/06 (15)
- Re: "most SACD titles are poorly recorded" ? Hardly - Ozzie 10:01:58 12/26/06 (8)
- Re: "most SACD titles are poorly recorded" ? Hardly - Ted Smith 12:57:12 12/26/06 (7)
- Re: "most SACD titles are poorly recorded" ? Hardly - Ozzie 09:17:23 12/27/06 (6)
- Re: "most SACD titles are poorly recorded" ? Hardly - Ted Smith 15:13:49 12/27/06 (5)
- Re: "most SACD titles are poorly recorded" ? Hardly - Ozzie 11:01:03 01/02/07 (2)
- Sorry that we are talking at cross purposes... - Ted Smith 11:44:58 01/02/07 (1)
- Re: Sorry that we are talking at cross purposes... - Ozzie 10:57:16 01/03/07 (0)
- Re: "most SACD titles are poorly recorded" ? Hardly - jazz1 11:48:47 12/28/06 (1)
- Re: "most SACD titles are poorly recorded" ? Hardly - Ted Smith 12:23:43 12/28/06 (0)
- Re: "most SACD titles are poorly recorded" ? Hardly - jazz1 06:41:48 12/26/06 (2)
- Re: "most SACD titles are poorly recorded" ? Hardly - Kal Rubinson 18:08:00 01/03/07 (0)
- The ultimate truth of the matter - Feanor 11:02:24 12/26/06 (0)
- Re: "most SACD titles are poorly recorded" ? Hardly - Todd Krieger 03:28:26 12/26/06 (2)
- Re: "most SACD titles are poorly recorded" ? Hardly - Ted Smith 12:58:56 12/26/06 (1)
- Sony shpuld have scrapped many of the rock titles. - Ozzie 09:24:16 12/27/06 (0)