Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - Anybody read "The Death of Dynamic Range" webpage? - darkmoebius 21:20:31 11/22/06 (48)

• Re: Anybody read "The Death of Dynamic Range" webpage? - George Mann 03:17:28 11/23/06 (36)
• George... - Audio Pharaoh 10:01:06 11/29/06 (0)
• Re: Anybody read "The Death of Dynamic Range" webpage? - admirer0x0@hotmail.com 03:32:18 11/29/06 (1)
• Yep, jitter is a real problem - Ted Smith 10:04:31 11/29/06 (0)
• Re: Anybody read "The Death of Dynamic Range" webpage? - audioengr 14:13:12 11/23/06 (3)
• Re: Anybody read "The Death of Dynamic Range" webpage? - George Mann 14:25:34 11/23/06 (2)
• Re: Anybody read "The Death of Dynamic Range" webpage? - audioengr 16:49:32 11/23/06 (0)
• There's no such word as "irregardless" and . . . - lazarus28 15:36:32 11/23/06 (0)
• Re: Anybody read "The Death of Dynamic Range" webpage? - Ted Smith 14:00:52 11/23/06 (14)
• Re: Anybody read "The Death of Dynamic Range" webpage? - George Mann 14:37:52 11/23/06 (13)
• I Think You're Trying To Say..... - Todd Krieger 00:28:43 11/24/06 (0)
• I understand and agree with the very essence of what you are saying ! - Quiet Earth 22:04:06 11/23/06 (0)
• Nobody "understand(s) what I am saying here?" ..Like I said, utter and complete gibberish...nt - NewStevo 20:34:14 11/23/06 (0)
• Re: Anybody read "The Death of Dynamic Range" webpage? - Ted Smith 19:19:14 11/23/06 (9)
• Re: Anybody read "The Death of Dynamic Range" webpage? - Werner 23:54:24 11/23/06 (8)
• Sorry folks, I failed to clarify my position in a way you can relate to. - George Mann 02:21:28 11/24/06 (7)
• Re: Sorry folks, I failed to clarify my position in a way you can relate to. - Werner 02:51:34 11/24/06 (6)
• You people are hopeless, and I never should have expected you to understand! - George Mann 03:01:49 11/24/06 (5)
• Nope, we know that it isn't perfect - Ted Smith 09:22:30 11/24/06 (4)
• And I'm afraid you never will. nt. - George Mann 11:25:09 11/24/06 (3)
• We know the standard technology and terminology, why do you give up so easily? [nt] - Ted Smith 11:31:46 11/24/06 (2)
• It would be best just to drop the subject. Here's why... - George Mann 12:06:49 11/24/06 (1)
• You might get some respect if you showed others some... - Ted Smith 12:47:13 11/24/06 (0)
• WOW!...What a bunch of gibberish....talk about pseudo-science!..nt - NewStevo 08:06:55 11/23/06 (13)
• Perhap's you should stick to a subject you have a clue about! nt. - George Mann 10:04:59 11/23/06 (12)
• Well it's obvious from your previous post that you know nothing about CDs and dynamic range...utter gibberish...nt - NewStevo 11:48:18 11/23/06 (11)
• As one of the engineers involved in its creation, I have forgoten more about it than you will ever know son! nt. - George Mann 12:48:07 11/23/06 (10)
• Re:that's a scary thought - mls-stl 10:11:19 11/24/06 (9)
• I am thru trying to explain it to you MORONS! - George Mann 11:22:27 11/24/06 (8)
• you exhibit the classic signs of a crackpot - tunenut 12:08:03 11/26/06 (4)
• I exhibit authentic digital knowledge that obviously isn't taught these days! - George Mann 13:58:40 11/26/06 (3)
• I guess calling people MORONS is "authentic digital knowledge" - tunenut 18:39:40 11/26/06 (2)
• Your just a closed minded fool who will never understand the real problems with digital! nt. - George Mann 07:07:34 11/27/06 (1)
• I probably appreciate analog more than you do - tunenut 09:33:03 11/27/06 (0)
• Re: I am thru trying to explain it to you MORONS! - Todd Krieger 12:17:46 11/24/06 (1)
• Well... - George Mann 12:57:49 11/24/06 (0)
• Re: could that be because you haven't tried? - mls-stl 11:34:56 11/24/06 (0)
• Some succeed - smart845 00:17:53 11/23/06 (0)
• Re: Anybody read "The Death of Dynamic Range" webpage? - Werner 23:49:43 11/22/06 (0)
• Re: Anybody read "The Death of Dynamic Range" webpage? - audioengr 22:24:15 11/22/06 (8)
• I don't completely agree with all of that. - Quiet Earth 09:06:46 11/23/06 (5)
• Re: I don't completely agree with all of that. - audioengr 10:12:08 11/23/06 (4)
• Re: I don't completely agree with all of that. - Werner 23:58:19 11/23/06 (0)
• That's right. Back in the 50s and 60s . . . - Quiet Earth 21:51:15 11/23/06 (2)
• Re: That's right. Back in the 50s and 60s . . . - audioengr 12:19:53 11/24/06 (0)
• The late 30's to the early 60's were the golden years of audio! nt. - George Mann 02:24:36 11/24/06 (0)
• I agree.... - darkmoebius 22:53:06 11/22/06 (1)
• Re: I agree.... - tketcham 04:25:17 11/23/06 (0)

Follow Ups

• Re: Anybody read "The Death of Dynamic Range" webpage? - George Mann 03:17:28 11/23/06 (36)
• George... - Audio Pharaoh 10:01:06 11/29/06 (0)
• Re: Anybody read "The Death of Dynamic Range" webpage? - admirer0x0@hotmail.com 03:32:18 11/29/06 (1)
• Yep, jitter is a real problem - Ted Smith 10:04:31 11/29/06 (0)
• Re: Anybody read "The Death of Dynamic Range" webpage? - audioengr 14:13:12 11/23/06 (3)
• Re: Anybody read "The Death of Dynamic Range" webpage? - George Mann 14:25:34 11/23/06 (2)
• Re: Anybody read "The Death of Dynamic Range" webpage? - audioengr 16:49:32 11/23/06 (0)
• There's no such word as "irregardless" and . . . - lazarus28 15:36:32 11/23/06 (0)
• Re: Anybody read "The Death of Dynamic Range" webpage? - Ted Smith 14:00:52 11/23/06 (14)
• Re: Anybody read "The Death of Dynamic Range" webpage? - George Mann 14:37:52 11/23/06 (13)
• I Think You're Trying To Say..... - Todd Krieger 00:28:43 11/24/06 (0)
• I understand and agree with the very essence of what you are saying ! - Quiet Earth 22:04:06 11/23/06 (0)
• Nobody "understand(s) what I am saying here?" ..Like I said, utter and complete gibberish...nt - NewStevo 20:34:14 11/23/06 (0)
• Re: Anybody read "The Death of Dynamic Range" webpage? - Ted Smith 19:19:14 11/23/06 (9)
• Re: Anybody read "The Death of Dynamic Range" webpage? - Werner 23:54:24 11/23/06 (8)
• Sorry folks, I failed to clarify my position in a way you can relate to. - George Mann 02:21:28 11/24/06 (7)
• Re: Sorry folks, I failed to clarify my position in a way you can relate to. - Werner 02:51:34 11/24/06 (6)
• You people are hopeless, and I never should have expected you to understand! - George Mann 03:01:49 11/24/06 (5)
• Nope, we know that it isn't perfect - Ted Smith 09:22:30 11/24/06 (4)
• And I'm afraid you never will. nt. - George Mann 11:25:09 11/24/06 (3)
• We know the standard technology and terminology, why do you give up so easily? [nt] - Ted Smith 11:31:46 11/24/06 (2)
• It would be best just to drop the subject. Here's why... - George Mann 12:06:49 11/24/06 (1)
• You might get some respect if you showed others some... - Ted Smith 12:47:13 11/24/06 (0)
• WOW!...What a bunch of gibberish....talk about pseudo-science!..nt - NewStevo 08:06:55 11/23/06 (13)
• Perhap's you should stick to a subject you have a clue about! nt. - George Mann 10:04:59 11/23/06 (12)
• Well it's obvious from your previous post that you know nothing about CDs and dynamic range...utter gibberish...nt - NewStevo 11:48:18 11/23/06 (11)
• As one of the engineers involved in its creation, I have forgoten more about it than you will ever know son! nt. - George Mann 12:48:07 11/23/06 (10)
• Re:that's a scary thought - mls-stl 10:11:19 11/24/06 (9)
• I am thru trying to explain it to you MORONS! - George Mann 11:22:27 11/24/06 (8)
• you exhibit the classic signs of a crackpot - tunenut 12:08:03 11/26/06 (4)
• I exhibit authentic digital knowledge that obviously isn't taught these days! - George Mann 13:58:40 11/26/06 (3)
• I guess calling people MORONS is "authentic digital knowledge" - tunenut 18:39:40 11/26/06 (2)
• Your just a closed minded fool who will never understand the real problems with digital! nt. - George Mann 07:07:34 11/27/06 (1)
• I probably appreciate analog more than you do - tunenut 09:33:03 11/27/06 (0)
• Re: I am thru trying to explain it to you MORONS! - Todd Krieger 12:17:46 11/24/06 (1)
• Well... - George Mann 12:57:49 11/24/06 (0)
• Re: could that be because you haven't tried? - mls-stl 11:34:56 11/24/06 (0)