In Reply to: RE: Antenna cable? Copper clad steel centre - for RG6 - WHY? posted by rick_m on July 25, 2012 at 08:19:08:
for home use.
This can't be good for RF, or any kind of long-term signal transmission performance, of any kind at AF or RF I'd think.
And, I doubt it's better than solid or braided copper on ANY kind of signal. Read the post that John Risch points too. Having read it it doesn't look very good for copper over steel now, does it?
Especially if it's easy to scrape the copper off. Steel is a shit-house conductor of signals. Yes?
Stronger? Is that really so important in cable that's going to be put in place and bent just once to do so?
It surely didn't become the way to go when copper prices rose sharply, did it, so when was the copper plated steel conductor introduced?
Anyone know?
In real/indexed terms in the late-mid 1970s say 1973. And again in the early 2000s.
Bullshit baffles lots of brains again, eh?!
:~)!
Warmest
Tim Bailey
Skeptical Measurer & Audio Scrounger
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- My issue with the steel conductor is that the copper can scratch off when using typical non-F type wall plates - Timbo in Oz 06:34:18 08/05/12 (0)