In Reply to: Why not? They're ripping you off. posted by jihad on January 11, 2011 at 12:00:40:
.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Why not? ahhh................................... no further comment from me. nt - Elizabeth 12:21:40 01/11/11 (14)
- Good, I don't know anyone that would pay 480% more for the same thing. - jihad 12:48:12 01/11/11 (13)
- I am not interested in discussing the BS you are spouting, not that it matters to you. THAT is why, not 'cuz - Elizabeth 16:45:05 01/11/11 (2)
- There is no BS in what I spout. - jihad 19:15:20 01/11/11 (0)
- RE: I am not interested in discussing the BS you are spouting, not that it matters to you. THAT is why, not 'cuz - jihad 19:14:23 01/11/11 (0)
- 100 to 1 - unclestu 14:12:16 01/11/11 (9)
- Which of "those" are you talking about? - jihad 14:25:12 01/11/11 (8)
- In a global economy - unclestu 11:43:39 01/12/11 (7)
- Stu, - jihad 18:01:58 01/12/11 (5)
- RE: Stu, - crom 05:58:11 01/13/11 (4)
- I wasn't talking about blatant copies or rip offs. - jihad 06:43:14 01/13/11 (3)
- RE: I wasn't talking about blatant copies or rip offs. - mschneider 14:23:31 01/13/11 (2)
- RE: I wasn't talking about blatant copies or rip offs. - jihad 15:26:17 01/13/11 (1)
- RE: I wasn't talking about blatant copies or rip offs. - mschneider 15:46:26 01/13/11 (0)
- That's why we need taxes and tariffs (back) on goods from overseas, especially China. - jihad 16:02:41 01/12/11 (0)