Home Inmate Central

Inmate Central, where civil and family-friendly discourse about off-audio topics (other than religion and politics) is welcome.

RE: I have a minority opinion

Putting taxpayer money in Tesla's left or right pockets is still putting taxpayer money in Tesla's pockets (even if you are laundering first). Your faux attempt at splitting hairs is mute.

This type of "logic" is synonymous with using a shell company (which is generally illegal) to obfuscate/launder the monetary trail. This "logic" is similar to Mao'Chi lying about paying the CCP-Wuhan-19-Viral-Lab "directly". While "directly" was technically true, he paid a shell company which made the payments on his behalf which equates to the same thing. No difference here, the money ends up in Tesla's pocket(s) in the form of artificially inflated sales profits.

If the taxpayers aren't funding the Tesla's sales incentives, the cars would not be sold in the volumes they have and Telsa would be filing Chapter 11. Simple fact.

As for splitting-hairs over the spelling of the limited fossil-fuel supply of battery raw materials mined overseas, that is another feeble attempt at obfuscation. Same issues apply irrespective of the spelling.

It is off shored. It is in limited supply. It is NOT renewable. It is not green. It's carbon footprint is hidden in 3rd world countries. The tax base is moved out of the USA's economy.


.

2022/03/30 Historical Records CENSORED


This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
  McShane Design  


Follow Ups Full Thread
Follow Ups

FAQ

Post a Message!

Forgot Password?
Moniker (Username):
Password (Optional):
  Remember my Moniker & Password  (What's this?)    Eat Me
E-Mail (Optional):
Subject:
Message:   (Posts are subject to Content Rules)
Optional Link URL:
Optional Link Title:
Optional Image URL:
Upload Image:
E-mail Replies:  Automagically notify you when someone responds.