Home Inmate Central

Inmate Central, where civil and family-friendly discourse about off-audio topics (other than religion and politics) is welcome.

Once again, you're back to your familiar tricks of trying to put words. . .

in other people's mouths. Who said they were more intelligent than ALL scientific and medical organizations? I certainly didn't.

And I'm supposed to believe that "it" is some "dark conspiracy"? Why don't you define your terms for once?

Did you ever consider the possibility that, while Jimmy Dore may not be as educated (or even as intlligent) as the people who work for your beloved corporate press, he may nevertheless be right to offer Dr. Malone a forum, and they could all be wrong? No - of course you haven't. You'd rather indulge in your tribal reaction. Jimmy Dore cheerfully refers to himself as a jagoff comedian working out of his garage, so of course that doesn't impress your discerning mind! You want to see the MONEY behind the opinions you read. Let me tell you this: financial backing does not necessarily make a statement true - something which you have yet to learn.

Oh - and you forgot! You left out some stuff about what the NIH says about Ivermectin - it almost seems like you did this on purpose. Here are some more statements from the NIH on Ivermectin:
Ivermectin is an FDA-approved broad-spectrum antiparasitic agent with demonstrated antiviral activity against a number of DNA and RNA viruses, including severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Despite this promise, the antiviral activity of ivermectin has not been consistently proven in vivo.

The 2015 Nobel Prize in Physiology and Medicine was awarded to William C. Campbell and Satoshi Omura for their discoveries leading to ivermectin. In addition to its extraordinary efficacy against parasitic diseases, ivermectin continues to offer new clinical applications due to its ability to be repurposed to treat new classes of diseases. Beyond its invaluable therapeutic role in onchocerciasis and strongyloidiasis, an increasing body of evidence points to the potential of ivermectin as an antiviral agent.

In light of the potential of ivermectin to prevent replication in a broad spectrum of viruses, the inhibition of importin [alpha-beta]1-mediated nuclear import of viral proteins is suggested as the probable mechanism underlying its antiviral activity. Since SARS-CoV-2 is an RNA virus, a similar mechanism of action may take place
This is from the NIH article linked below. Kinda gives us a different picture, doesn't it? I love how you omit certain information just so you can "win" an argument. When you add the statements I quoted back in, the stance of the NIH might seem a little different from what you were trying to convey.

As for Stanford's disgraceful record with respect to war-mongering and corporations, yes, corporations are well represented at that institution. And yet you yourself claim that we shouldn't judge the faculty by their tainted (i.e., tainted by corporations) connections and status, much less bring them into the discussion. So which is it, tin? Are they "tainted" or not? The whole point you try to make is absurd, since there are many, many students and faculty members who oppose the very corporate policies which the institution as a whole and other Stanford faculty members (like Condoleeza Rice) embrace.


This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
  Western Glow Tube Service  


Follow Ups Full Thread
Follow Ups

FAQ

Post a Message!

Forgot Password?
Moniker (Username):
Password (Optional):
  Remember my Moniker & Password  (What's this?)    Eat Me
E-Mail (Optional):
Subject:
Message:   (Posts are subject to Content Rules)
Optional Link URL:
Optional Link Title:
Optional Image URL:
Upload Image:
E-mail Replies:  Automagically notify you when someone responds.