Tube DIY Asylum Do It Yourself (DIY) paradise for tube and SET project builders. |
|
In Reply to: RE: No, not really. posted by tube wrangler on January 15, 2023 at 01:36:34:
because I would like to try it.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups Full ThreadTopic - UL Distortion - Triode_Kingdom 10:26:33 12/23/22 (57)
- RE: UL Distortion - cellailuca 09:56:36 01/09/23 (0)
- F. Langford Smith (whoever that is;) on UL - elblanco 14:39:34 12/29/22 (3)
- this is a lot more info than my Langford-Smith RDH - Story 09:17:31 12/30/22 (0)
- part2 - elblanco 14:41:23 12/29/22 (1)
- part3 - elblanco 14:42:28 12/29/22 (0)
- RE: UL Distortion - 7868 19:34:10 12/25/22 (0)
- RE: UL Distortion - elblanco 16:21:03 12/24/22 (27)
- RE: UL Distortion - Triode_Kingdom 07:30:51 12/25/22 (1)
- RE: UL Distortion - dave slagle 07:57:45 12/25/22 (0)
- RE: UL Distortion - sony6060 23:24:08 12/24/22 (24)
- FWIW, if the UL is set up right, it looks a lot like that - Ralph 09:31:10 12/28/22 (1)
- It's unlikely the KT88 curves were generated with an improperly tapped transformer. - Steve O 15:51:37 12/28/22 (0)
- I was going to post that - Tre' 07:49:12 12/26/22 (21)
- LOL... - PakProtector 13:50:44 12/26/22 (2)
- I would have to see that. nt - Tre' 12:03:48 12/27/22 (1)
- RE: I would have to see that. nt - PakProtector 14:31:16 12/27/22 (0)
- well...then it must sound like crap /nt - Story 08:23:48 12/26/22 (17)
- "sound like" is an interesting phrase. nt - Tre' 07:52:42 12/27/22 (16)
- so is "looks like" /nt - Story 10:27:18 12/27/22 (15)
- No, not really. - Tre' 12:08:03 12/27/22 (14)
- RE: No, not really. - dave slagle 05:50:32 12/28/22 (9)
- RE: No, not really. - tube wrangler 00:59:29 01/15/23 (0)
- RE: No, not really. - Lew 06:29:20 12/30/22 (5)
- RE: No, not really. - tube wrangler 01:36:34 01/15/23 (4)
- Can you post how you did it - airtime 06:32:22 01/16/23 (0)
- I'm up for that challenge - 1973shovel 05:55:53 01/15/23 (2)
- RE: I'm up for that challenge - tube wrangler 15:42:31 01/15/23 (1)
- "Since the 6SN7 is the better tube, if practical, use it" - 1973shovel 05:07:22 01/16/23 (0)
- err, since it is impossible to know ALL parameters... all objective IS subjective (logic 101} including - Cleantimestream 17:09:08 12/28/22 (0)
- I've wondered which designers use the tube within - Story 07:39:39 12/28/22 (0)
- RE: No, not really. - Story 12:43:57 12/27/22 (3)
- "I cannot make certain text lines on this reply look bold" - 1973shovel 16:15:28 12/28/22 (1)
- RE: "I cannot make certain text lines on this reply look bold" - Story 17:15:21 12/28/22 (0)
- RE: No, not really. - Tre' 12:50:12 12/27/22 (0)
- No. UL was patented. So - Ralph 13:05:01 12/23/22 (22)
- RE: No. UL was patented. So - Triode_Kingdom 19:06:59 12/23/22 (14)
- Right. - Ralph 10:46:18 12/24/22 (13)
- RE: Right. - Triode_Kingdom 11:16:10 12/24/22 (12)
- a patentable concept is - Ralph 09:47:27 12/26/22 (11)
- RE: a patentable concept is - Triode_Kingdom 07:40:45 12/27/22 (10)
- Right. As I mentioned previously - Ralph 09:25:39 12/27/22 (9)
- RE: Right. As I mentioned previously - Tre' 05:55:35 12/28/22 (8)
- RE: Right. As I mentioned previously - tube wrangler 15:55:19 01/15/23 (0)
- Surprising that in this entire discussion - Steve O 11:25:32 12/28/22 (5)
- Thanks. - Tre' 14:03:08 12/28/22 (4)
- The 18-18.5% H/K discuss - Steve O 15:36:26 12/28/22 (3)
- I thought the impedance ratio was the turns ratio squared? - Tre' 17:49:54 12/28/22 (2)
- +1 nt - Ralph 09:28:30 12/28/22 (0)
- RE: No. UL was patented. So - 6bq5 13:17:55 12/23/22 (6)
- RE: No. UL was patented. So - dave slagle 06:24:49 12/24/22 (2)
- RE: No. UL was patented. So - Paul Joppa 07:30:35 12/24/22 (1)
- RE: No. UL was patented. So - dave slagle 09:02:41 12/24/22 (0)
- A possibly different perspective on the matter - Steve O 19:52:03 12/23/22 (1)
- RE: A possibly different perspective on the matter - PakProtector 03:23:21 12/25/22 (0)
- ^^ +1 nt - Ralph 13:48:37 12/23/22 (0)
Follow Ups
- Can you post how you did it - airtime 06:32:22 01/16/23 (0)