In Reply to: RE: Actually... posted by Donald North on July 4, 2012 at 00:30:20:
I just said it would have been a good test.
Comparing that same circuit with the only change being the Miller fully driven vs. not.
If one likes that circuit they might like it more with the Miller fully driven.
"While I don't disagree with what you are saying, I don't believe that such designs are sonic junk because they don't have zero phase shift within the audible range."
Neither do I but I'm not buying into the opposite claims made so many times we've lost count.
I'm looking at one now.
http://www.audioasylum.com/forums/set/messages/7/71278.html
"Just design your equipment so it does what it's supposed to do-- AND NOTHING ELSE."
Delusions of grandeur when the thing doesn't even overcome Miller?
That's my point, not that the thing is junk and nobody should like the sound of it. Everybody likes different things.
That OK, I just wish Dennis would stop saying "it's the best amp ever made" and "everyone who doesn't understand that from a technical (common sense) point of view has no common sense".
From a technical point of view, the thing is flawed.
Tre'
Have Fun and Enjoy the Music
"Still Working the Problem"
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Actually... - Tre' 07:30:20 07/04/12 (9)
- RE: Actually... - RC Daniel 00:28:30 07/05/12 (5)
- RE: Actually... - Tre' 08:35:21 07/05/12 (0)
- Any talk of Miller is stupid, archic, and off-base..... - drlowmu 07:13:25 07/05/12 (3)
- RE: Any talk of Miller is stupid, archic, and off-base..... - Lew 14:10:25 07/05/12 (2)
- RE: Any talk of Miller is stupid, archic, and off-base..... - drlowmu 23:51:26 07/05/12 (1)
- RE: Any talk of Miller is stupid, archic, and off-base..... - Lew 07:43:05 07/06/12 (0)
- RE: Actually... - Stephen R 10:03:16 07/04/12 (2)
- RE: Actually... - Tre' 11:00:57 07/04/12 (1)
- RE: Actually... - Stephen R 15:14:24 07/04/12 (0)