In Reply to: RE: Ultimately... posted by cpotl on October 3, 2015 at 20:40:55:
For now it seems the only present way to prove wire directionality is a blind test.
The problem with ordinary blind tests - they destroy the intimate contact you need with music, when you're doing a serious listen. I'm giving some examples:
1. You are probably surrounded by people you don't know, you don't like or who make you anxious. The best way to be tested is to be left alone in the listening room. Only one person who is your best friend must swap the equipment and stop the music.
2. The words "blind test". A test? Knowing you will participate in this kind of activity already gives you anxiety. Music is to be nowhere near a test. By doing this, you mustn't feel in a exam activity, but in a friendly, fun one.
3. You are probably given to listen between many swaps. There is a problem - each individual brain has its limit of musical saturation. After reaching a certain number of listening, the brain gets tired and doesn't care anymore what you're listening. 20 swaps per one day is extremely much. I consider 4 swaps per day a maximum.
4. The "tested" audiophile individual must be in a listening mood. No test attitude, not the slightest traces of anxiety, stress, hunger, aches. These impart the listening quality of the listener.
5. The individual should be tested on his own system, mainly because it's the same system he has claimed the existence of audible differences due to "unusual" interventions.
Let's say I succeed of performing this kind of blind test with all these criteria, how will I prove it's not counterfeit to you?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Ultimately... - aknaydenov 05:32:39 10/04/15 (22)
- RE: Ultimately... - gusser 11:03:01 10/04/15 (21)
- RE: Ultimately... - aknaydenov 12:50:44 10/04/15 (1)
- RE: Ultimately... - gusser 13:08:34 10/04/15 (0)
- RE: Ultimately... - aknaydenov 12:43:08 10/04/15 (18)
- RE: Ultimately... - gusser 13:04:45 10/04/15 (17)
- RE: Ultimately... - aknaydenov 13:34:40 10/04/15 (16)
- RE: Ultimately... - gusser 16:29:52 10/04/15 (1)
- RE: Ultimately... - aknaydenov 20:52:22 10/04/15 (0)
- RE: Ultimately... - cpotl 16:00:51 10/04/15 (13)
- RE: Ultimately... - aknaydenov 20:47:40 10/04/15 (12)
- RE: Ultimately... - cpotl 03:22:49 10/05/15 (11)
- RE: Ultimately... - aknaydenov 09:48:41 10/05/15 (10)
- RE: Ultimately... - gusser 09:59:50 10/05/15 (9)
- RE: Ultimately... - aknaydenov 10:48:54 10/05/15 (8)
- RE: Ultimately... - Tre' 12:06:17 10/05/15 (6)
- RE: Ultimately... - aknaydenov 12:44:05 10/05/15 (5)
- RE: Ultimately... - Tre' 13:41:51 10/05/15 (4)
- RE: Ultimately... - aknaydenov 00:16:13 10/06/15 (3)
- You are right. - Tre' 07:33:46 10/06/15 (2)
- RE: You are right. - aknaydenov 03:02:00 10/10/15 (1)
- RE: You are right. - Tre' 13:03:35 10/10/15 (0)
- RE: Ultimately... - gusser 11:02:55 10/05/15 (0)