In Reply to: Re: An attempt to explain posted by Monstrous Mike on November 18, 2002 at 08:06:10:
Clear as mud, huh?No, you are quite clear and I fully agree. Moreover, I have never seen what I would consider a valid challenge to this proposition. Language and misinterpretation often seem to get in the way when discussing all of this, but from a scientific viewpoint, I wish we could at least get basic agreement on fundamental principles such as this.
If I'm overlooking something, I'm open to comments.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: An attempt to explain - Phil Tower 10:21:39 11/18/02 (0)