In Reply to: RE: I agree - but it works both ways. posted by Pat D on October 15, 2010 at 02:55:02:
lol - well, you were skeptical so you searched and found something that refuted what he posted a different time. Since I've read a lot of his posts over the years, I was not at all skeptical when he posted that if he replaced "a component" in his system and heard a difference, he would expect that the new component was broken. Therefore, I felt no need to pursue further. I'll give it a little time later and see if I can find the exact post. Unfortunately, I remember only the general lunacy and not the title or date.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: I agree - but it works both ways. - kerr 08:30:25 10/15/10 (9)
- RE: I agree - but it works both ways. - Pat D 11:45:03 10/15/10 (3)
- RE: I agree - but it works both ways. - kerr 11:56:46 10/15/10 (2)
- RE: I agree - but it works both ways. - Pat D 14:22:59 10/15/10 (1)
- The only thing you've ever proven... - kerr 18:51:10 10/15/10 (0)
- Have you ever tried.... - carcass93 08:50:05 10/15/10 (4)
- Those who function with nothing but beliefs... - kerr 10:04:45 10/15/10 (3)
- You guys are repeating yourselves. (nt) - Pat D 11:46:12 10/15/10 (2)
- How much longer must we? nt - kerr 11:58:09 10/15/10 (1)
- RE: How much longer must we? nt - Pat D 18:31:09 10/15/10 (0)