RE: I agree - but it works both ways. - Pat D

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - Unscientific DBT advocate(s). - carcass93 12:53:46 10/11/10 (124)

RE: Unscientific DBT advocate(s). - Tony Lauck 19:32:17 10/11/10 (123)

Number of reasons, not the last of which... - carcass93 09:06:46 10/12/10 (120)

RE: Number of reasons, not the last of which... - josh358 13:57:53 10/16/10 (4)

'The wag in me is tempted to say "That explains a lot."' - b.l.zeebub 09:12:11 10/18/10 (3)

RE: 'The wag in me is tempted to say "That explains a lot."' - josh358 10:07:23 10/18/10 (2)

RE: 'The wag in me is tempted to say "That explains a lot."' - b.l.zeebub 13:04:10 10/18/10 (1)

RE: 'The wag in me is tempted to say "That explains a lot."' - josh358 13:45:07 10/18/10 (0)

This is only a skill available to some, self-anointed few. - Norm 19:00:32 10/14/10 (2)

RE: This is only a skill available to some, self-anointed few. - Tony Lauck 08:42:23 11/04/10 (1)

I think it is unscientific claptrap on both sides. - Norm 13:41:18 01/13/11 (0)

RE: Number of reasons, not the last of which... - Presto 12:28:40 10/12/10 (110)

RE: Number of reasons, not the last of which... - josh358 14:03:51 10/16/10 (0)

I agree - but it works both ways. - carcass93 13:29:55 10/12/10 (108)

RE: I agree - but it works both ways. - Presto 16:13:36 10/12/10 (107)

RE: I agree - but it works both ways. - b.l.zeebub 08:44:48 10/22/10 (0)

RE: I agree - but it works both ways. - josh358 14:05:10 10/16/10 (0)

RE: I agree - but it works both ways. - Pat D 10:25:56 10/13/10 (102)

RE: I agree - but it works both ways. - kerr 13:12:05 10/13/10 (101)

RE: I agree - but it works both ways. - tomservo 07:34:20 10/15/10 (8)

RE: I agree - but it works both ways. - josh358 14:10:55 10/16/10 (0)

RE: I agree - but it works both ways. - Pat D 15:29:06 10/15/10 (2)

RE: I agree - but it works both ways. - tomservo 18:52:15 10/15/10 (1)

RE: I agree - but it works both ways. - josh358 14:12:02 10/16/10 (0)

RE: I agree - but it works both ways. - kerr 08:27:00 10/15/10 (3)

One interesting question about "differences" is... - Presto 13:28:46 10/16/10 (2)

RE: One interesting question about "differences" is... - kerr 17:21:35 10/16/10 (0)

RE: One interesting question about "differences" is... - josh358 13:47:24 10/16/10 (0)

RE: I agree - but it works both ways. - Pat D 14:58:24 10/13/10 (89)

RE: I agree - but it works both ways. - kerr 04:25:22 10/14/10 (88)

RE: I agree - but it works both ways. - Pat D 02:55:02 10/15/10 (10)

RE: I agree - but it works both ways. - kerr 08:30:25 10/15/10 (9)

RE: I agree - but it works both ways. - Pat D 11:45:03 10/15/10 (3)

RE: I agree - but it works both ways. - kerr 11:56:46 10/15/10 (2)

RE: I agree - but it works both ways. - Pat D 14:22:59 10/15/10 (1)

The only thing you've ever proven... - kerr 18:51:10 10/15/10 (0)

Have you ever tried.... - carcass93 08:50:05 10/15/10 (4)

Those who function with nothing but beliefs... - kerr 10:04:45 10/15/10 (3)

You guys are repeating yourselves. (nt) - Pat D 11:46:12 10/15/10 (2)

How much longer must we? nt - kerr 11:58:09 10/15/10 (1)

RE: How much longer must we? nt - Pat D 18:31:09 10/15/10 (0)

homework - Tony Lauck 20:28:49 10/14/10 (76)

RE: homework - kerr 08:23:29 10/15/10 (75)

RE: homework - Tony Lauck 10:04:14 10/15/10 (1)

RE: homework - kerr 10:11:15 10/15/10 (0)

"Good response Soundmind" - E-Stat 09:15:40 10/15/10 (72)

RE: "Good response Soundmind" - kerr 09:56:12 10/15/10 (71)

Sorry, I misunderstood - E-Stat 10:05:21 10/15/10 (70)

Thanks for digging this out. It was before my time here - who was that... - carcass93 11:30:09 10/15/10 (3)

One of many fools who have come and gone...-nt - E-Stat 12:31:08 10/15/10 (0)

RE: Thanks for digging this out. It was before my time here - who was that... - kerr 11:41:07 10/15/10 (1)

RE: Thanks for digging this out. It was before my time here - who was that... - Ted Smith 21:54:21 10/24/10 (0)

This looks promising - kerr 10:21:15 10/15/10 (65)

With actual citations in hand... - E-Stat 11:40:19 10/15/10 (64)

RE: With actual citations in hand... - Pat D 11:52:08 10/15/10 (62)

The Power of Poor Memory... - E-Stat 12:26:48 10/15/10 (34)

Ah, I see, a "tu quoque" argument. - Pat D 14:03:42 10/15/10 (33)

Wrong again - E-Stat 14:31:15 10/15/10 (29)

Since you resist the point below, let's analyze. - Pat D 19:36:56 10/16/10 (11)

I'm not going to dissect this next journey into confusion - E-Stat 06:37:05 10/17/10 (6)

You keep changing your ground. - Pat D 05:03:15 10/18/10 (5)

You need to read again what I said - E-Stat 06:18:56 10/18/10 (4)

Changing your ground again. - Pat D 07:22:14 10/18/10 (3)

Evidence? - Tony Lauck 07:50:25 10/18/10 (0)

Your memory fails you again - E-Stat 07:33:22 10/18/10 (1)

RE: Your memory fails you again - Pat D 10:23:28 10/19/10 (0)

Please fix your references. - Tony Lauck 21:13:41 10/16/10 (3)

The URL works for me. - Pat D 04:53:10 10/18/10 (1)

Thank you. - Tony Lauck 06:46:09 10/18/10 (0)

There is no reference to BassNut's test - E-Stat 06:31:11 10/17/10 (0)

So how does this show cables sound different? (nt) - Pat D 15:20:44 10/15/10 (16)

It doesn't - E-Stat 15:39:35 10/15/10 (15)

I know. - Pat D 18:10:36 10/15/10 (14)

RE: I know. - josh358 14:38:45 10/16/10 (4)

RE: I know. - Pat D 19:52:33 10/16/10 (3)

RE: I know. - josh358 20:27:09 10/16/10 (2)

RE: I know. - Pat D 05:16:33 10/18/10 (1)

RE: I know. - josh358 09:11:02 10/19/10 (0)

You know what? - E-Stat 20:40:37 10/15/10 (8)

It would help if you actually read that old thread at AR. - Pat D 19:44:30 10/16/10 (7)

That is exactly what I would say to you! - E-Stat 06:29:13 10/17/10 (6)

Why do persist in propagating falsehoods? - Pat D 04:44:15 10/18/10 (0)

You're not getting it! - kerr 08:21:59 10/17/10 (4)

RE: You're not getting it! - Pat D 05:21:16 10/18/10 (1)

RE: You're not getting it! - kerr 09:41:53 10/18/10 (0)

Such just boggles the mind -nt - E-Stat 09:00:16 10/17/10 (1)

I don't think that's true - kerr 09:48:30 10/17/10 (0)

Geez.... When people say that the only thing that's worse ... - carcass93 14:19:03 10/15/10 (2)

As usual, you have nothing to add beyond name calling. - Pat D 14:25:19 10/15/10 (1)

You, with each of your posts, just YEARN to be called names. - carcass93 14:30:36 10/15/10 (0)

Burden of Proof - Tony Lauck 12:14:02 10/15/10 (26)

If you can spare wasting a few minutes of your life... - E-Stat 12:28:35 10/15/10 (25)

RE: If you can spare wasting a few minutes of your life... - Pat D 15:18:09 10/15/10 (24)

Sophists? Inquisitors? - Tony Lauck 09:10:10 10/16/10 (22)

RE: Sophists? Inquisitors? - Pat D 10:20:30 10/19/10 (0)

"Possibly deliberate"? - E-Stat 09:49:44 10/17/10 (0)

RE: Sophists? Inquisitors? - josh358 10:17:30 10/16/10 (19)

RE: Sophists? Inquisitors? - Tony Lauck 11:06:36 10/16/10 (18)

RE: Sophists? Inquisitors? - josh358 11:49:09 10/16/10 (17)

Follow the money. nt - Tony Lauck 12:15:45 10/16/10 (16)

RE: Follow the money. nt - josh358 12:46:56 10/16/10 (15)

RE: Follow the money. nt - Tony Lauck 18:15:05 10/16/10 (14)

RE: Follow the money. nt - josh358 18:44:05 10/16/10 (13)

RE: Follow the money. nt - Tony Lauck 19:30:01 10/16/10 (12)

RE: Follow the money. nt - josh358 20:06:39 10/16/10 (11)

Beware of Experts - Tony Lauck 21:31:24 10/16/10 (10)

RE: Beware of Experts - josh358 06:24:35 10/17/10 (9)

RE: Beware of Experts - Tony Lauck 08:09:50 10/17/10 (8)

RE: Beware of Experts - josh358 08:57:42 10/19/10 (7)

RE: Beware of Experts - Tony Lauck 07:30:14 10/20/10 (6)

RE: Beware of Experts - josh358 09:33:36 10/20/10 (5)

RE: Beware of Experts - Tony Lauck 11:02:12 10/20/10 (4)

RE: Beware of Experts - josh358 06:55:29 10/21/10 (3)

RE: Beware of Experts - Tony Lauck 08:25:09 10/21/10 (2)

RE: Beware of Experts - josh358 10:29:20 10/21/10 (1)

RE: Beware of Experts - Tony Lauck 10:56:02 10/21/10 (0)

You really need to get a grip on reality - E-Stat 15:45:01 10/15/10 (0)

RE: With actual citations in hand... - kerr 11:42:26 10/15/10 (0)

Others - E-Stat 13:44:10 10/13/10 (1)

RE: Others - Pat D 15:05:04 10/13/10 (0)

RE: I agree - but it works both ways. - tomservo 07:13:22 10/13/10 (1)

RE: I agree - but it works both ways. - rick_m 09:11:39 10/13/10 (0)

RE: Number of reasons, not the last of which... - Tony Lauck 09:33:22 10/12/10 (0)

Do you think the pretenders... - mkuller 21:18:32 10/11/10 (1)

Nope, I don't think so/ - Analog Scott 22:14:11 10/11/10 (0)

Follow Ups

RE: I agree - but it works both ways. - Pat D 14:58:24 10/13/10 (89)

RE: I agree - but it works both ways. - kerr 04:25:22 10/14/10 (88)

RE: I agree - but it works both ways. - Pat D 02:55:02 10/15/10 (10)

RE: I agree - but it works both ways. - kerr 08:30:25 10/15/10 (9)

RE: I agree - but it works both ways. - Pat D 11:45:03 10/15/10 (3)

RE: I agree - but it works both ways. - kerr 11:56:46 10/15/10 (2)

RE: I agree - but it works both ways. - Pat D 14:22:59 10/15/10 (1)

The only thing you've ever proven... - kerr 18:51:10 10/15/10 (0)

Have you ever tried.... - carcass93 08:50:05 10/15/10 (4)

Those who function with nothing but beliefs... - kerr 10:04:45 10/15/10 (3)

You guys are repeating yourselves. (nt) - Pat D 11:46:12 10/15/10 (2)

How much longer must we? nt - kerr 11:58:09 10/15/10 (1)

RE: How much longer must we? nt - Pat D 18:31:09 10/15/10 (0)

homework - Tony Lauck 20:28:49 10/14/10 (76)

RE: homework - kerr 08:23:29 10/15/10 (75)

RE: homework - Tony Lauck 10:04:14 10/15/10 (1)

RE: homework - kerr 10:11:15 10/15/10 (0)

"Good response Soundmind" - E-Stat 09:15:40 10/15/10 (72)

RE: "Good response Soundmind" - kerr 09:56:12 10/15/10 (71)

Sorry, I misunderstood - E-Stat 10:05:21 10/15/10 (70)

Thanks for digging this out. It was before my time here - who was that... - carcass93 11:30:09 10/15/10 (3)

One of many fools who have come and gone...-nt - E-Stat 12:31:08 10/15/10 (0)

RE: Thanks for digging this out. It was before my time here - who was that... - kerr 11:41:07 10/15/10 (1)

RE: Thanks for digging this out. It was before my time here - who was that... - Ted Smith 21:54:21 10/24/10 (0)

This looks promising - kerr 10:21:15 10/15/10 (65)

With actual citations in hand... - E-Stat 11:40:19 10/15/10 (64)

RE: With actual citations in hand... - Pat D 11:52:08 10/15/10 (62)

The Power of Poor Memory... - E-Stat 12:26:48 10/15/10 (34)

Ah, I see, a "tu quoque" argument. - Pat D 14:03:42 10/15/10 (33)

Wrong again - E-Stat 14:31:15 10/15/10 (29)

Since you resist the point below, let's analyze. - Pat D 19:36:56 10/16/10 (11)

I'm not going to dissect this next journey into confusion - E-Stat 06:37:05 10/17/10 (6)

You keep changing your ground. - Pat D 05:03:15 10/18/10 (5)

You need to read again what I said - E-Stat 06:18:56 10/18/10 (4)

Changing your ground again. - Pat D 07:22:14 10/18/10 (3)

Evidence? - Tony Lauck 07:50:25 10/18/10 (0)

Your memory fails you again - E-Stat 07:33:22 10/18/10 (1)

RE: Your memory fails you again - Pat D 10:23:28 10/19/10 (0)

Please fix your references. - Tony Lauck 21:13:41 10/16/10 (3)

The URL works for me. - Pat D 04:53:10 10/18/10 (1)

Thank you. - Tony Lauck 06:46:09 10/18/10 (0)

There is no reference to BassNut's test - E-Stat 06:31:11 10/17/10 (0)

So how does this show cables sound different? (nt) - Pat D 15:20:44 10/15/10 (16)

It doesn't - E-Stat 15:39:35 10/15/10 (15)

I know. - Pat D 18:10:36 10/15/10 (14)

RE: I know. - josh358 14:38:45 10/16/10 (4)

RE: I know. - Pat D 19:52:33 10/16/10 (3)

RE: I know. - josh358 20:27:09 10/16/10 (2)

RE: I know. - Pat D 05:16:33 10/18/10 (1)

RE: I know. - josh358 09:11:02 10/19/10 (0)

You know what? - E-Stat 20:40:37 10/15/10 (8)

It would help if you actually read that old thread at AR. - Pat D 19:44:30 10/16/10 (7)

That is exactly what I would say to you! - E-Stat 06:29:13 10/17/10 (6)

Why do persist in propagating falsehoods? - Pat D 04:44:15 10/18/10 (0)

You're not getting it! - kerr 08:21:59 10/17/10 (4)

RE: You're not getting it! - Pat D 05:21:16 10/18/10 (1)

RE: You're not getting it! - kerr 09:41:53 10/18/10 (0)

Such just boggles the mind -nt - E-Stat 09:00:16 10/17/10 (1)

I don't think that's true - kerr 09:48:30 10/17/10 (0)

Geez.... When people say that the only thing that's worse ... - carcass93 14:19:03 10/15/10 (2)

As usual, you have nothing to add beyond name calling. - Pat D 14:25:19 10/15/10 (1)

You, with each of your posts, just YEARN to be called names. - carcass93 14:30:36 10/15/10 (0)

Burden of Proof - Tony Lauck 12:14:02 10/15/10 (26)

If you can spare wasting a few minutes of your life... - E-Stat 12:28:35 10/15/10 (25)

RE: If you can spare wasting a few minutes of your life... - Pat D 15:18:09 10/15/10 (24)

Sophists? Inquisitors? - Tony Lauck 09:10:10 10/16/10 (22)

RE: Sophists? Inquisitors? - Pat D 10:20:30 10/19/10 (0)

"Possibly deliberate"? - E-Stat 09:49:44 10/17/10 (0)

RE: Sophists? Inquisitors? - josh358 10:17:30 10/16/10 (19)

RE: Sophists? Inquisitors? - Tony Lauck 11:06:36 10/16/10 (18)

RE: Sophists? Inquisitors? - josh358 11:49:09 10/16/10 (17)

Follow the money. nt - Tony Lauck 12:15:45 10/16/10 (16)

RE: Follow the money. nt - josh358 12:46:56 10/16/10 (15)

RE: Follow the money. nt - Tony Lauck 18:15:05 10/16/10 (14)

RE: Follow the money. nt - josh358 18:44:05 10/16/10 (13)

RE: Follow the money. nt - Tony Lauck 19:30:01 10/16/10 (12)

RE: Follow the money. nt - josh358 20:06:39 10/16/10 (11)

Beware of Experts - Tony Lauck 21:31:24 10/16/10 (10)

RE: Beware of Experts - josh358 06:24:35 10/17/10 (9)

RE: Beware of Experts - Tony Lauck 08:09:50 10/17/10 (8)

RE: Beware of Experts - josh358 08:57:42 10/19/10 (7)

RE: Beware of Experts - Tony Lauck 07:30:14 10/20/10 (6)

RE: Beware of Experts - josh358 09:33:36 10/20/10 (5)

RE: Beware of Experts - Tony Lauck 11:02:12 10/20/10 (4)

RE: Beware of Experts - josh358 06:55:29 10/21/10 (3)

RE: Beware of Experts - Tony Lauck 08:25:09 10/21/10 (2)

RE: Beware of Experts - josh358 10:29:20 10/21/10 (1)

RE: Beware of Experts - Tony Lauck 10:56:02 10/21/10 (0)

You really need to get a grip on reality - E-Stat 15:45:01 10/15/10 (0)

RE: With actual citations in hand... - kerr 11:42:26 10/15/10 (0)

RE: I agree - but it works both ways.

Post a Message!