Re: Sorry, Phil, but the article above yours in the thread - Phil Tower

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - Some questions on double blind testing. - Phil Tower 03:10:40 11/12/02 (46)

Um, err... - jj 17:53:15 11/14/02 (1)

Re: Um, err... - Rod M 18:34:59 11/14/02 (0)

Umm - RGA 20:02:04 11/13/02 (8)

Total stuff and nonsense! - jj 18:27:40 11/15/02 (1)

Re: Total stuff and nonsense! - RGA 14:21:54 11/16/02 (0)

Re: Umm - Phil Tower 07:05:13 11/14/02 (5)

Sorry, Phil, but the article above yours in the thread - jj 18:30:08 11/15/02 (4)

Re: Sorry, Phil, but the article above yours in the thread - Phil Tower 06:32:03 11/16/02 (3)

I mean RGA's post that you responded to. - jj 13:37:23 11/16/02 (2)

Re: I mean RGA's post that you responded to. - RGA 14:40:53 11/16/02 (1)

Um ... - jj 16:59:07 11/16/02 (0)

Some of my answers.... - Monstrous Mike 09:18:06 11/13/02 (0)

What do you conclude if DBT results show even a big random sample hears no difference? - Norm 08:04:25 11/13/02 (1)

Re: What do you conclude if DBT results show even a big random sample hears no difference? - Phil Tower 08:28:22 11/13/02 (0)

Re: Your all-capped proposition - Bruce from DC 13:19:06 11/12/02 (3)

Re: Your all-capped proposition - Phil Tower 15:50:45 11/12/02 (2)

Re: You've lost me here, Phil - Bruce from DC 07:43:44 11/13/02 (1)

Re: You've lost me here, Phil - Phil Tower 08:06:22 11/13/02 (0)

I wish you had numbered your points...... - Jitter_by_Coffee 07:50:10 11/12/02 (0)

OK I will give it a shot - Robert Hamel 07:45:51 11/12/02 (0)

Reminds me of a Methods class I took about thirty- - rcrump 04:13:27 11/12/02 (25)

One more thing, while I'm at it. - Phil Tower 05:09:58 11/12/02 (23)

Re: One more thing, while I'm at it. - rcrump 06:39:23 11/12/02 (22)

Re: One more thing, while I'm at it. - Jitter_by_Coffee 07:59:06 11/12/02 (8)

Re: One more thing, while I'm at it. - Ubiquitous Skittercat ;,,,~ 19:32:49 11/12/02 (7)

Re: One more thing, while I'm at it. - Dan Banquer 09:40:55 11/14/02 (0)

Re: One more thing, while I'm at it. - Jitter_by_Coffee 20:44:15 11/13/02 (0)

I believe it is the tests that are flawed, not the equipment - E-Stat 14:47:59 11/13/02 (4)

Re: I believe it is the tests that are flawed, not the equipment - Jitter_by_Coffee 20:38:26 11/13/02 (3)

Therein lies the challenge - E-Stat 03:50:55 11/14/02 (2)

Re: Therein lies the challenge - Jitter_by_Coffee 08:58:01 11/14/02 (1)

We certainly agree here - E-Stat 13:44:27 11/14/02 (0)

Re: One more thing, while I'm at it. - Phil Tower 06:55:38 11/12/02 (12)

That is the problem, too much - rcrump 07:10:59 11/12/02 (11)

Re: That is the problem, too much - Phil Tower 07:51:01 11/12/02 (10)

I think I'll start my own camp Phil... - rcrump 08:11:38 11/12/02 (9)

I've already formed my own camp of one.... - Phil Tower 08:25:19 11/12/02 (8)

Re: I've already formed my own camp of one.... - rcrump 09:54:17 11/12/02 (7)

I have a suggestion... - Jitter_by_Coffee 15:39:09 11/12/02 (6)

Re: I have a suggestion... - Rod M 08:38:47 11/14/02 (3)

Re: I have a suggestion... - Jitter_by_Coffee 08:54:31 11/14/02 (2)

Re: I have a suggestion... - Rod M 11:25:17 11/14/02 (1)

Re: I have a suggestion... - Jitter_by_Coffee 09:20:21 11/15/02 (0)

Perhaps you need to select a panel of real scientists to ascertain - rcrump 16:42:27 11/12/02 (1)

Re: Perhaps you need to select a panel of real scientists to ascertain - Jitter_by_Coffee 20:26:17 11/13/02 (0)

Re: Reminds me of a Methods class I took about thirty- - Phil Tower 05:05:00 11/12/02 (0)

Follow Ups

Re: Sorry, Phil, but the article above yours in the thread - Phil Tower 06:32:03 11/16/02 (3)

I mean RGA's post that you responded to. - jj 13:37:23 11/16/02 (2)

Re: I mean RGA's post that you responded to. - RGA 14:40:53 11/16/02 (1)

Um ... - jj 16:59:07 11/16/02 (0)