In Reply to: An attempt to explain posted by John C. - Aussie on November 15, 2002 at 00:02:22:
I think this whole thing of perception, preference and scientific validation gets way more confused that it needs to.I'll repeat a hypothetical I just used in another post. I have two sets of cables, A and B. I switch them in and out of my system, listening each time I make the switch knowing which cable I’m listening to, and then claim that they sound different. At that point I'm describing my "perception". Whether or not my perception of difference is due to actual audible sonic differences between A and B can only be "scientifically validated" or verified through control testing, and even at that, only to a certain statistical confidence level.
If I say I like cable A better than cable B because A sounds better to me, that is my "preference", and it doesn't matter if the difference I'm hearing between the two cables is really due to actual audible sonic differences between the two cables.
It seems to me that the distinction between perception, preference and validation is just as simple as this. Moreover, I think it is important we not blur this distinction because we already have more issues, unresolved debates and obstacles in the "validation" arena than we can handle, and don't need to be unnecessarily complicating the matter further.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: An attempt to explain - Phil Tower 00:23:18 11/15/02 (11)
- Re: An attempt to explain - sgb 08:30:27 11/16/02 (1)
- Re: An attempt to explain - Phil Tower 10:00:27 11/16/02 (0)
- Re: An attempt to explain - jeff mai 01:08:03 11/16/02 (8)
- Re: An attempt to explain - Phil Tower 06:29:55 11/16/02 (7)
- Re: An attempt to explain - Monstrous Mike 08:06:10 11/18/02 (1)
- Re: An attempt to explain - Phil Tower 10:21:39 11/18/02 (0)
- No! - David Aiken 12:15:41 11/16/02 (4)