In Reply to: Re: Sorry, that's wrong. That's PART of what training is for. posted by Jitter_by_Coffee on November 13, 2002 at 20:49:18:
Not sure which you think I was talking about.I'll say it again. ALL of the reliable evidence I've seen suggests very very strongly that when a listener has learned to hear a difference, they can do so in a short test.
Learning HOW to hear that difference, however, is a learning process. There is no replacement for that process, and it is not fast or simple.
JJ - Philalethist and Annoyer of Bullies
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- LISTENER TRAINING is what I'm talking about. - jj 21:32:35 11/13/02 (7)
- Re: LISTENER TRAINING is what I'm talking about. - Jitter_by_Coffee 09:20:05 11/14/02 (6)
- Doggonit, I hate computers sometimes..... - Jitter_by_Coffee 09:24:17 11/14/02 (5)
- Err, to be clear... - jj 17:56:59 11/14/02 (4)
- Re: Err, to be clear... - Jitter_by_Coffee 09:26:35 11/15/02 (3)
- Err. No. If we're talking about the most sensitive tests... - jj 18:16:07 11/15/02 (2)
- Re: Err. No. If we're talking about the most sensitive tests... - Jitter_by_Coffee 07:03:03 11/18/02 (1)
- Really? What's your controls and their result? - jj 09:36:38 11/18/02 (0)