|
Propeller Head Plaza Technical and scientific discussion of amps, cables and other topics. |
|
|
|
Propeller Head Plaza Technical and scientific discussion of amps, cables and other topics. |
|
In Reply to: Re: Your all-capped proposition posted by Bruce from DC on November 12, 2002 at 13:19:06:
From reading your post and the many others that, in varying degrees advance the "wire is wire is wire" point of view (and advocate increased use of DBT's to "prove" it),Just for the record, there is nothing in my post that even remotely suggests that I am advancing the "wire is wire is wire" point of view. Moreover if you search the archives here under my current “Phil Tower†moniker and my prior "pctower" moniker and all of the archives at AR under “pctowerâ€, you will not find a single post of mine that even comes close to advancing such a point of view. I have been using after-market cables for over 20 years, back to the very first MITs, Monster, Audioquest and FMS Blues. In selecting my current cables I auditioned (sighted) well over two dozen different brands of cables (including Goertz Micropurl interconnects) over a two year period before selecting my current collection of cables.
I’m curious if you checked out my system before writing your post. It absolutely amazes me that the simple act of raising a scientific issue regarding objective verification of actual sonic differences between and among different cables leads people to automatically label the person raising the issue as a proponent of the “wire is wire is wire†point of view.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Your all-capped proposition - Phil Tower 15:50:45 11/12/02 (2)
- Re: You've lost me here, Phil - Bruce from DC 07:43:44 11/13/02 (1)
- Re: You've lost me here, Phil - Phil Tower 08:06:22 11/13/02 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
