Propeller Head Plaza

Posted by jj (P) on December 04, 2002 at 09:54:30

In Reply to: Re: Argumentum ad exhaustion is hardly convincing posted by Jitter_by_Coffee on December 04, 2002 at 06:25:59:

But you won't provide evidence.

You have come up with "problems" in the "normal" way that people run things but you won't provide evidence for that, either.

What's more, you seem unable to understand how one can evaluate the performance of a subject relative to known thresholds.

Why don't you submit a paper to the next US AES convention?
JJ - Philalethist and Annoyer of Bullies

• Re: Your point? You want to claim that your methods are effective.... - Jitter_by_Coffee 07:51:01 12/05/02 (11)
  • Semantic evasion likewise. - jj 15:11:53 12/05/02 (10)
    • Re: Semantic evasion likewise. - Jitter_by_Coffee 17:16:40 12/05/02 (9)
      • Let's not let the facts bother you, eh? - jj 19:25:02 12/05/02 (8)
        • Re: Let's not let the facts bother you, eh? - Jitter_by_Coffee 11:46:59 12/06/02 (7)
          • Stop creating false positions for me. - jj 23:49:17 12/08/02 (6)
            • Re: Stop creating false positions for me. - Jitter_by_Coffee 06:31:06 12/09/02 (5)
              • I guess, once again, you can't deal with the facts... - jj 16:38:53 12/09/02 (4)
                • Re: I guess, once again, you can't deal with the facts... - Jitter_by_Coffee 07:14:00 12/18/02 (3)
                  • It's time for you to retire from this, and admit you have nothing at hand - jj 17:58:41 12/18/02 (2)
                    • Re: It's time for you to retire from this, and admit you have nothing at hand - Jitter_by_Coffee 05:22:44 12/20/02 (1)
                      • See the CFP above - jj 21:00:26 12/26/02 (0)