Propeller Head Plaza

Posted by jj (P) on December 03, 2002 at 18:03:27

In Reply to: Re: Well, if you run one subject, and they control the switching... posted by JItter_by_Coffee on December 03, 2002 at 13:52:28:

And if you think that a lack of performance on the part of a subject can't be detected, well...

It's time for some specifics from you, thank you.
JJ - Philalethist and Annoyer of Bullies

• Re: Argumentum ad exhaustion is hardly convincing - Jitter_by_Coffee 06:25:59 12/04/02 (32)
  • It's called "peer review", Jit - E-Stat 18:00:48 12/04/02 (18)
    • Re: It's called "peer review", Jit - Jitter_by_Coffee 07:54:26 12/05/02 (17)
      • Here - E-Stat 09:24:36 12/05/02 (16)
        • And by all means - Jitter_by_Coffee 11:51:38 12/05/02 (10)
          • Why bother? - E-Stat 16:28:36 12/05/02 (9)
            • Re: Why bother? - Jitter_by_Coffee 16:59:32 12/05/02 (8)
              • It is truly a shame that - E-Stat 20:10:33 12/05/02 (7)
                • Re: It is truly a shame that - Jitter_by_Coffee 11:50:07 12/06/02 (6)
                  • Re: It is truly a shame that - Jitter_by_Coffee 11:52:01 12/06/02 (5)
                    • Indeed opinions play a part - E-Stat 14:20:55 12/06/02 (4)
                      • Re: Indeed opinions play a part - Jitter_by_Coffee 22:37:10 12/06/02 (3)
                        • Let me refresh you memory - E-Stat 07:26:55 12/07/02 (2)
                          • Re: Let me refresh you memory - Jitter_by_Coffee 06:37:48 12/09/02 (1)
                            • Actually, I was at Disney two weeks ago - E-Stat 11:49:06 12/09/02 (0)
        • Re: Here - Jitter_by_Coffee 11:47:34 12/05/02 (4)
          • Re: Here - E-Stat 14:41:06 12/05/02 (3)
            • Re: Here - Jitter_by_Coffee 16:58:50 12/05/02 (2)
              • They do so on a regular basis - E-Stat 20:07:34 12/05/02 (1)
                • Re: They do so on a regular basis - Jitter_by_Coffee 11:48:26 12/06/02 (0)
  • Your point? You want to claim that your methods are effective.... - jj 09:54:30 12/04/02 (12)
    • Re: Your point? You want to claim that your methods are effective.... - Jitter_by_Coffee 07:51:01 12/05/02 (11)
      • Semantic evasion likewise. - jj 15:11:53 12/05/02 (10)
        • Re: Semantic evasion likewise. - Jitter_by_Coffee 17:16:40 12/05/02 (9)
          • Let's not let the facts bother you, eh? - jj 19:25:02 12/05/02 (8)
            • Re: Let's not let the facts bother you, eh? - Jitter_by_Coffee 11:46:59 12/06/02 (7)
              • Stop creating false positions for me. - jj 23:49:17 12/08/02 (6)
                • Re: Stop creating false positions for me. - Jitter_by_Coffee 06:31:06 12/09/02 (5)
                  • I guess, once again, you can't deal with the facts... - jj 16:38:53 12/09/02 (4)
                    • Re: I guess, once again, you can't deal with the facts... - Jitter_by_Coffee 07:14:00 12/18/02 (3)
                      • It's time for you to retire from this, and admit you have nothing at hand - jj 17:58:41 12/18/02 (2)
                        • Re: It's time for you to retire from this, and admit you have nothing at hand - Jitter_by_Coffee 05:22:44 12/20/02 (1)
                          • See the CFP above - jj 21:00:26 12/26/02 (0)