In Reply to: Re: Look, running multiple subjects who can see, hear, etc, each other posted by Jitter_by_Coffee on December 02, 2002 at 06:26:34:
First, unless you're running a self-training test, which again is something you do only for one subject at a time, you must in fact be familiar with the material as well as the test method, etc, via training if nothing else.You claim this is "introducing a bias", well, then, why don't you submit a paper to JASA or a good psychometrics journal and have it reviewed and see what people say? Why don't you show your results that demonstrate sensitivity? Evidence, man, let's see it.
As to the number of subjects, just how many trials do you run per subject?
Oh, and no, not everyone runs multiple subjects per test. Do not presume to tell others how they work.
You're willing to anonymously introduce all of these claims, but it's time to cough up. Show me the papers, the evidence, and the test results that show that you can run a sensitive test when the subjects are not familiar with the material and you run multiple subjects at once. Show the evidence that the subjects don't cross-influence each other, as well.
You've made the claims, they runs strongly counter to both my experience and the state of the art as expressed in the literature, so let's see the evidence.
JJ - Philalethist and Annoyer of Bullies
Follow Ups:
You can not post to an archived thread.