In Reply to: There is no point posted by audiozorro on July 29, 2008 at 18:52:29:
Based on the data sheet of the Analog Devices ASRC chip used for sample rate conversion in the Benchmark, I can see no theoretical reason to use external dejitter boxes. See http://www.analog.com/static/imported-files/data_sheets/AD1896.pdf, e.g., figure 8.
But then, it is hard to explain so many forum posts like those of Kenn below. Moreover, it is harder to explain things like the off-ramp, pace-car, superclock combinations offered by Empirical Audio, if a Benchmark DAC1 can solve all such problems for much less money.
At times like this I find myself resorting to a Charles Hansen like response along the lines of "something is going on, but we don't know what." Of course it could be that it is just me that doesn't understand what is going on, so I would be glad if anyone can offer some plausible theories.
--dsdreamer
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- In theory, I would have to agree - dsdreamer 14:20:00 07/30/08 (8)
- Note that I used DIP Upsampler... - Kenn 19:51:58 07/30/08 (1)
- I also used DIP Upsampler not the DIP - audiozorro 10:16:18 07/31/08 (0)
- RE: In theory, I would have to agree - audiozorro 16:36:06 07/30/08 (0)
- RE: In theory, I would have to agree - Roseval 15:32:17 07/30/08 (4)
- RE: In theory, I would have to agree - Tony Lauck 06:44:21 07/31/08 (3)
- RE: In theory, I would have to agree - cfmsp 15:47:05 08/06/08 (0)
- RE: In theory, I would have to agree - Roseval 06:50:49 07/31/08 (1)
- RE: In theory, I would have to agree - Tony Lauck 07:36:34 07/31/08 (0)