In Reply to: RE: Hmmm . . . posted by Tony Lauck on July 7, 2012 at 10:25:24:
You "could" care less? What a faux pas. Your entire argument avoids the issue, which is that bit perfect reproduction exists.
That sort of changes the parameters of copyright, as I'm sure you'll agree.
It is very easy to say that Eric will sell Tony his music collection.
But what if Eric has a bit perfect representation of that collection in reserve? Has he sold the collection or has he merely sold a physical manifestation of it?
That would be the question I'd like an answer to.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- I thought English was your native language. - esande 13:36:49 07/07/12 (11)
- RE: I thought English was your native language. - Tony Lauck 14:42:48 07/07/12 (5)
- RE: I thought English was your native language. - esande 15:03:56 07/07/12 (4)
- RE: I thought English was your native language. - Tony Lauck 15:14:44 07/07/12 (3)
- RE: I thought English was your native language. - esande 15:31:03 07/07/12 (0)
- You are all over the place or perhaps I am? :-) - JoshT 15:30:41 07/07/12 (1)
- RE: You are all over the place or perhaps I am? :-) - Tony Lauck 18:24:18 07/07/12 (0)
- As I read Tony's post, he would agree with you - JoshT 14:36:23 07/07/12 (4)
- RE: As I read Tony's post, he would agree with you - esande 14:49:17 07/07/12 (3)
- I never said that - JoshT 15:25:55 07/07/12 (2)
- RE: I never said that - esande 15:47:59 07/07/12 (1)
- Yes, I believe you are required to - JoshT 17:53:51 07/07/12 (0)