In Reply to: RE: I believe Julius would have called those "H3a" posted by Toto on April 2, 2015 at 07:32:28:
but of course I could be wrong. I once owned the model shown by Rhinofi. It is a much earlier amplifier, probably built in the 50s or early 60s that was produced under the "Harvard Electronics" label, when Futterman was more "in business". I think it was rated at 30 or so Watts per channel and was not in the "H3" series. But Rhinofi may be able to prove me wrong by showing a photo with the model number on the chassis. The H3s were all monoblocks, for one thing.EDIT. The internet is a wonderful thing sometimes. I did a quick search and found two facts to modify my post: (1) I am incorrect, not all H3 series amplifiers were monoblocks, and (2) I was correct, the amp in your photo is not an H3a; it is an H3.
Edits: 04/02/15 04/02/15
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- I don't believe that's an H3a in Rhino's photo…, - Lew 08:52:21 04/02/15 (10)
- RE: I don't believe that's an H3a in Rhino's photoâ¦, - Toto 09:03:17 04/02/15 (9)
- RE: I don't believe that's an H3a in Rhino's photoâ¦, - Lew 11:48:20 04/02/15 (8)
- Speaking of photos... - Toto 14:45:44 04/02/15 (7)
- RE: Speaking of photos... - rhinohifi714 20:25:57 04/02/15 (5)
- …into 16 ohms, yes? - Lew 07:10:09 04/03/15 (4)
- ââ¬Â¦into LEW - rhinohifi714 09:55:43 04/03/15 (3)
- You didn't stipulate the speaker impedance, and... - Lew 11:34:44 04/03/15 (1)
- RE: You didn't stipulate the speaker impedance, and... - rhinohifi714 04:56:25 04/05/15 (0)
- for what it's worth. - rhinohifi714 10:08:11 04/03/15 (0)
- RE: Speaking of photos... - Toto 15:04:14 04/02/15 (0)