In Reply to: RE: more or less posted by Lew on May 8, 2012 at 20:24:17:
The question is really twofold- do you *really* need to equalize, and if so, what's the best way?
But before that you have to sort out how to do the amp in the first place and not get killed. IMO that's a lot more important :)
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- You were plenty clear enough - Ralph 09:34:55 05/09/12 (24)
- This is hypothetical..., - Lew 11:07:51 05/09/12 (23)
- RE: This is hypothetical..., - Ralph 12:19:57 05/09/12 (22)
- RE: This is hypothetical..., - Lew 18:39:54 05/09/12 (21)
- RE: This is hypothetical..., - Ralph 09:17:22 05/10/12 (20)
- RE: This is hypothetical..., - KIS 15:07:20 05/10/12 (3)
- RE: This is hypothetical..., - tyu 06:11:13 05/11/12 (2)
- RE: This is hypothetical..., - Ralph 10:57:46 05/11/12 (1)
- RE: This is hypothetical..., - tyu 13:40:10 05/11/12 (0)
- RE: This is hypothetical..., - Lew 15:04:55 05/10/12 (15)
- balanced input on that would be easy. nt - Ralph 20:03:24 05/10/12 (13)
- RE: balanced input on that would be easy. nt - Lew 16:28:10 05/11/12 (12)
- can we get just a tad more to the left in that photo? nt - Ralph 12:14:30 05/15/12 (8)
- Here you go... - Lew 19:24:52 05/15/12 (7)
- much better - Lew 19:37:51 05/15/12 (6)
- And more better - Lew 19:38:52 05/15/12 (5)
- RE: And more better - Ralph 08:31:56 05/16/12 (4)
- RE: And more better - Lew 11:43:56 05/16/12 (3)
- RE: And more better - Ralph 12:22:07 05/16/12 (2)
- Designer = Roger Modjeski - Lew 12:40:33 05/16/12 (1)
- RE: Designer = Roger Modjeski - tyu 05:23:09 06/11/12 (0)
- RE: balanced input on that would be easy. nt - tyu 07:58:37 05/12/12 (2)
- RE: balanced input on that would be easy. nt - Lew 10:26:41 05/12/12 (1)
- RE: balanced input on that would be easy. nt - tyu 11:58:08 05/12/12 (0)
- RE: This is hypothetical..., - KIS 15:46:56 05/10/12 (0)