In Reply to: Digital Resolution -- An Analysis posted by John Elison on September 2, 2020 at 17:21:46:
I think what you have is an analysis of raw file size, but not entirely correct because you can use lossless compression on those PCM files to make them smaller w/o any loss in audio quality. For example you can compress with FLAC or ALAC and upon playback there's zero loss in quality.But I don't think it's really a comparison of resolution, just file size and maybe bit-rate for streaming. Additionally, you reach a point of diminishing returns rather quickly in terms of actual audible differences.
IMHO the biggest factor is how well the original material was recorded / mastered. I'd take a well recorded and mastered CD 16/44.1 file over a "higher resolution" 24/192 or DSD512 file from a lesser quality recording any day.
And for folks who rip vinyl, I doubt that there's anything to be gained going beyond about 24/96 as there's no more useful information or dynamic range than that coming off the LP.... perhaps a bit more noise to pickup but that's about it.
Edits: 09/05/20 09/05/20
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Digital Resolution -- An Analysis - AbeCollins 09:45:12 09/05/20 (10)
- RE: Digital Resolution -- An Analysis - John Elison 10:42:08 09/05/20 (9)
- RE: Digital Resolution -- An Analysis - AbeCollins 11:23:00 09/05/20 (8)
- RE: Digital Resolution -- An Analysis - John Elison 13:39:42 09/05/20 (7)
- Now, if we understood the relationship between bit "density" and perceived sound quality. nt - G Squared 11:45:11 09/10/20 (3)
- RE: Now, if we understood the relationship between bit "density" and perceived sound quality. nt - flood2 17:42:45 09/10/20 (0)
- That might be different for everybody! /nt\ - John Elison 15:15:43 09/10/20 (1)
- Anyone with a working knowledge of Information Theory ... - flood2 17:45:21 09/10/20 (0)
- RE: Digital Resolution -- An Analysis - rivervalley817 14:18:39 09/05/20 (2)
- RE: Digital Resolution -- An Analysis - lmaletz@comcast.net 09:37:34 09/13/20 (0)
- Thanks for the link... - John Elison 16:13:39 09/05/20 (0)