In Reply to: RE: "desiring that DAC manufacturers should go this route (for a licensing fee of course)"... posted by Ivan303 on June 26, 2017 at 19:56:46:
>> it turns out that MQA is little more than an attempt to license a digital filter? <<
I don't think that is a complete picture. Originally it was promoted as a way to reduce the file size of high-res files. It clearly does so for sampling rates of 2x or greater, through the use of lossy encoding techniques. This is a clear benefit for streaming service providers, but less so for their subscribers - they are charged by data transfer volumes, whereas most consumers pay extra only for higher speeds, regardless of overall transfer volume. (If one considers single-rate (eg, 44.1kHz and 48kHz) files with 24 bits of resolution as "high-res", MQA would seem to be less successful at reducing file size.)
Later it seemed MQA's goals expanded to "improving" the sound quality over the original high-res digital file. This is the aspect to which your comment appears to be aimed.
Finally MQA also appears to provide a means for the record labels to re-deploy DRM, at least for resolutions above 4x/16.
As always, solely my personal opinions, prone to error and not necessarily those of my employer or legal counsel.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: "desiring that DAC manufacturers should go this route (for a licensing fee of course)"... - Charles Hansen 22:46:58 06/26/17 (12)
- "Leaky" filters and DRM... - E-Stat 10:00:08 06/27/17 (2)
- RE: "Leaky" filters and DRM... - Isaak J. Garvey 15:21:03 06/27/17 (1)
- I'm with 'ya! -nt - E-Stat 16:08:42 06/27/17 (0)
- Dang! That might explain... - Ivan303 07:53:23 06/27/17 (8)
- RE: Dang! That might explain... - rt66indierock 11:30:28 06/28/17 (7)
- RE: "150 companies have signed NDA"... - Ivan303 19:23:33 06/28/17 (0)
- RE: Dang! That might explain... - Isaak J. Garvey 12:13:36 06/28/17 (5)
- RE: Dang! That might explain... - rt66indierock 16:47:31 06/28/17 (4)
- Threatens to demean a substantial portion of the audio press. - jusbe 16:00:34 06/29/17 (1)
- RE: Threatens to demean a substantial portion of the audio press. - Isaak J. Garvey 17:39:21 06/29/17 (0)
- RE: Dang! That might explain... - Isaak J. Garvey 17:32:20 06/28/17 (1)
- Why the press is shoveling this shit? - mbnx01 11:36:11 06/30/17 (0)