In Reply to: RE: Marantz SA10 Reviews posted by Disbeliever on April 27, 2017 at 05:31:55:
Disbeliever writes:
"I doubt if many will buy the expensive Marantz SA-1O . hiredfox a very experienced Marantz user finds redbook CD inferior to the older CD7 and the SA7-S1 that requires a very expensive dCs master clock to give an adequate performance."
Since the CD7 is essentially unobtainable and was also very expensive, I don't think this is the right standard for most people. I would consider buying the SA10 if it plays both SACDs and CD's better than something like the SA14 (which I own, and which costs about 1/3 as much as the SA10).
I still haven't heard a comparison between the CD playbook of the SA10 and the CD playback of something like the SA14.
Another interesting comparison would be between the SA10 and the PS Audio two-box solution,
which they claim improves both SACD and CD playback. I expect we'll have to wait a long time for such a comparison, but I hope to hear more quickly about the CD playback of the SA10 compared to other players.
Actually the SA14 sounds pretty musical to me, and I am most likely going to just stay with it.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Marantz SA10 Reviews - airheadair 15:14:42 04/27/17 (9)
- RE: Marantz SA10 Reviews - gotoma8 17:28:34 02/10/19 (4)
- RE: Marantz SA10 Reviews - fantja 03:13:43 03/13/19 (3)
- RE: Marantz SA10 Reviews - Flemke 03:52:23 03/19/19 (1)
- RE: Marantz SA10 Reviews - fantja 04:44:17 05/15/19 (0)
- RE: Marantz SA10 Reviews - Disbeliever 00:52:24 03/15/19 (0)
- RE: Marantz SA10 Reviews - Disbeliever 00:11:35 04/28/17 (0)
- RE: Marantz SA10 Reviews - fantja 22:33:22 04/27/17 (2)
- RE: Marantz SA10 Reviews - airheadair 11:20:03 04/28/17 (1)
- RE: Marantz SA10 Reviews - fantja 14:11:06 04/28/17 (0)