In Reply to: We must hear things differently :) posted by E-Stat on April 13, 2017 at 08:40:07:
Well, we are off topic. I once did agree. But, I have found electrostat hybrids to have improved over the years. And, they definitely overcome many weakness of full range dipoles, such as dynamics, efficiency and dipole bass cancellation. I previously owned Martin CLS full range 'stat dipoles and even with subwoofers below 100Hz, they always had an artificial thinness in the mid/upper bass that was incurable.
Maybe I have grown accustomed to it, but I do not hear the discontinuity to which you refer, even in comparison to other purely dynamic speakers. Yes, the CLSs were wonderfully coherent in their range. But, I sensed no loss of that when I upgraded to my current aged ML Prodigys some time ago.
Perhaps also the time correction effect of the Dirac room EQ I use now plays a role. Also, it has been my experience that many criticisms of woofers and subwoofers, like "slowness", etc., really have to do with room modal effects introducing uneven frequency response, boominess and overhang.
I do not think we can directly hear dispersion patterns, but we hear only the diffuse effects of dispersion quite indirectly via the complex room reflections they induce.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: We must hear things differently :) - Fitzcaraldo215 10:57:13 04/13/17 (6)
- RE: We must hear things differently :) - E-Stat 11:56:15 04/13/17 (5)
- RE: We must hear things differently :) - Fitzcaraldo215 13:46:17 04/13/17 (4)
- RE: We must hear things differently :) - E-Stat 15:32:46 04/13/17 (3)
- RE: We must hear things differently :) - Fitzcaraldo215 09:26:23 04/14/17 (2)