In Reply to: Highreasaudio dot com MQA Rant posted by Isaak J. Garvey on February 21, 2017 at 15:17:45:
Almost certainly a hack. Highresaudio continue to offer MQA titles as I write (checked around 2 minutes ago). I also cannot imagine any genuine company run by professionals composing that final sentence. One would have to be very naive to do so. The use of English is also poor e.g. "none" for "no" and " offer use of freedom".
Also why would you post the discontinuance of a format on Twitter and Facebook but not mention it on your actual website ?
I would also add that the claim made in the posting does not add up technically ( as the claimed loss of 3 bits = 21 bits recovery and not 17 as MQA is "carried" in a 24 bit word).
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Highreasaudio dot com MQA Rant - PAR 04:34:29 02/22/17 (11)
- RE: Highreasaudio dot com MQA Rant - Isaak J. Garvey 07:17:53 02/22/17 (10)
- RE: Highreasaudio dot com MQA Rant - PAR 07:46:27 02/22/17 (9)
- RE: Highreasaudio dot com MQA Rant - Isaak J. Garvey 08:00:26 02/22/17 (8)
- RE: Highreasaudio dot com MQA Rant - PAR 08:42:06 02/22/17 (7)
- RE: Highreasaudio dot com MQA Rant - Isaak J. Garvey 12:12:23 02/22/17 (6)
- RE: Highreasaudio dot com MQA Rant - Mercman 13:02:49 02/23/17 (5)
- RE: Highreasaudio dot com MQA Rant - Isaak J. Garvey 13:50:16 02/23/17 (4)
- RE: Highreasaudio dot com MQA Rant - Mercman 15:15:39 02/23/17 (3)
- RE: Highreasaudio dot com MQA Rant - Isaak J. Garvey 15:32:09 02/23/17 (2)
- RE: Highreasaudio dot com MQA Rant - Mercman 16:11:31 02/23/17 (1)
- RE: Highreasaudio dot com MQA Rant - Isaak J. Garvey 16:28:19 02/23/17 (0)