In Reply to: RE: Marantz SA-10si Reviewed posted by PAR on February 16, 2017 at 12:36:05:
Sadly, Andrew Everard's review of the SA-10S1 is brief and superficial, and disappoints as a result offering little useful guidance to experienced listeners. It's OK being first in line if you take full advantage of the head start that you have been given over your competitors by the supplier but this review just isn't good enough for a machine that has been years in development and boasts the long neglected single bit processing principles from end-to end.
Odd too that KK wasn't allocated the review, if anybody knows Marantz spinners Ken does and he would have offered far more insight.
Black mark Andrew, wonder who gets to have it next?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Marantz SA-10si Reviewed - hiredfox 13:50:08 02/18/17 (8)
- RE: Marantz SA-10si Reviewed - fantja 15:44:00 02/18/17 (7)
- RE: Marantz SA-10si Reviewed - Disbeliever 00:24:46 02/19/17 (6)
- RE: Marantz SA-10si Reviewed - airheadair 08:04:43 02/19/17 (4)
- RE: Marantz SA-10si Reviewed - hiredfox 10:23:13 02/20/17 (0)
- RE: Marantz SA-10si Reviewed - Disbeliever 12:01:01 02/19/17 (2)
- RE: Marantz SA-10si Reviewed - hiredfox 10:28:38 02/20/17 (0)
- RE: Marantz SA-10si Reviewed - fantja 05:40:24 02/20/17 (0)
- RE: Marantz SA-10si Reviewed - fantja 05:22:24 02/19/17 (0)