In Reply to: Re: But, it's fair to say that, for both of you, SACD is better than either, right? <nt> posted by jimcate@pdq.net on November 28, 2000 at 17:55:00:
>>post "opinions as facts"<<Already a British magazine has stated that a cheap Sony (in sacd mode, (the cd mode was poor)) was not as MUSICAL as there Krell cdp reference. Others and myself have already claimed the 777 is not as good as the SCD1 IMO and yes the 777 is 'cheaper' then the SCD1.
Cost differenctial - not withstanding, using deductive reasoning - cheaper units GENERALLY will sound worse then the more expensive counterparts - in any type of equipment. History has proven that statement correct!
Furthermore - I base my opinions more on "living" with the unit over a period of time - instead of your suggestion of DBT.
TBone
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Hmmm... - TBone 08:41:07 11/29/00 (0)