In Reply to: RE: Yes I did watch the entire video. And I just watched it again. even worse the second time posted by Dale Clark on December 5, 2020 at 11:23:51:
he simply didn't like it. He says there were micro scratches from it moving around during shipping. Micro scratches that would not show on the video. That is not a defect. He didn't like the sound quality. An opinion he gets to have. He makes no mention of even playing the second LP.
Like I said in my first post, preferences are inarguable. The original jacket was damaged. That was the reason for the replacement. I'd be curious to know how it got so severely bent.The packaging does not have enough room for that degree of bending. And that severe bend was not a factory defect either. It was damage. Really bad damage.
We have no idea how either LP sounded as far as noise is concerned. It was never specifically addressed in the video. So I take it you did not get to personally listen to either copy?
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- The first record was not defective - Analog Scott 12:03:12 12/05/20 (2)
- RE: The first record was not defective - Dale Clark 06:06:05 12/07/20 (1)
- Why bother with a third copy? - Analog Scott 09:25:07 12/07/20 (0)