I realized yesterday that Stereophile was one of the very few publications that did not make any mention of Albert VonSchweikert's passing. I sent a message to Editor Jim Austin yesterday via Facebook Messenger, concluding with "Your silence on this is deafening". I have heard absolutely nothing. I wonder if there is bad blood between the Magazine and the product? Anyone know if there is a rift between them?
"I've always been mad, I know I've been mad, like the
most of us...very hard to explain why you're mad, even if you're not mad..."
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - Upset With Stereophile. - stereo5 08:30:46 06/05/20 (8)
- RE: Review of 100K Von Scheikerts in July SP. nt - Travis 17:23:46 06/08/20 (1)
- Just $95k, if you can live with the "passive" version. :P - David S. 11:50:40 06/11/20 (0)
- RE: Upset With Stereophile. - Jim Austin 09:07:52 06/05/20 (5)
- The way all the old guys are keeling over . . . - Brian H P 14:03:16 06/05/20 (3)
- That was pretty much my thinking - Jim Austin 14:04:42 06/05/20 (2)
- RE: That was pretty much my thinking - nvinyl66 06:20:37 06/07/20 (0)
- when I was in grad school - mhardy6647 15:07:58 06/06/20 (0)
- RE: Upset With Stereophile. - stereo5 09:33:48 06/05/20 (0)