In Reply to: RE: Thanks. Increases my curiousity about MQA. But what nobody mentions is....... posted by Isaak J. Garvey on June 6, 2017 at 10:29:40:
At this point I don't know how MQA works. Is it employed during the recording stage, mixing or mastering stage? Has zilch to do with any of that and is just employed in playback?
Thought something had to be encoded on digital files before/during mastering, but judging from your post I may well be wrong.
No, as mentioned earlier I'm not into downloading and have no hi-rez recordings. I have some r&b cd's, a few rock/pop cd's by artists like Sting and Steely Dan, some "classical" and a bunch of Latin/Brazilian cd's. But my digital collection is primarily jazz. I've never been into most white rock/pop, including the well known artists/groups so many inmates enjoy. Hence, I normally don't encounter problems related to things like the "loudness wars", at least not manifestations that make recordings sound compressed to shit.
Almost all of what I have sounds good enough to me on rbcd. I'm certainly open to checking out hi-rez and technology like MQA, but to be honest *as a listener* its not very important to me at this point. If I hear MQA, feel its a huge improvement and it becomes a professional standard I couldn't ignore it if I continue to record my own music.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Likely an ignorant comment by me. - Rick W 11:24:08 06/06/17 (21)
- RE: Likely an ignorant comment by me. - Isaak J. Garvey 13:24:35 06/06/17 (2)
- I have all those older titles on vinyl. - Rick W 14:22:37 06/06/17 (1)
- RE: I have all those older titles on vinyl. - Isaak J. Garvey 14:41:12 06/06/17 (0)
- RE: Likely an ignorant comment by me. - Charles Hansen 12:57:55 06/06/17 (17)
- RE: Likely an ignorant comment by me. - Isaak J. Garvey 13:20:21 06/06/17 (16)
- Sorry, wrong nomenclature - Charles Hansen 22:19:11 06/06/17 (13)
- RE: Sorry, wrong nomenclature - Isaak J. Garvey 10:25:49 06/07/17 (11)
- It appears that MQA has managed to mislead the Sound on Sound author - Charles Hansen 12:58:19 06/07/17 (10)
- RE: It appears that MQA has managed to mislead the Sound on Sound author - Isaak J. Garvey 13:58:04 06/07/17 (9)
- Fair Enough - Charles Hansen 16:03:33 06/07/17 (8)
- one "reviewer" - DAP 16:00:05 06/08/17 (5)
- RE: one "reviewer" - Isaak J. Garvey 17:48:47 06/08/17 (4)
- RE: one "reviewer" - SpotcheckBilly12345 07:31:39 06/09/17 (2)
- RE: one "reviewer" - Isaak J. Garvey 12:03:23 06/09/17 (0)
- That's a little extreme :-) - DAP 08:27:32 06/09/17 (0)
- socks off - DAP 19:59:12 06/08/17 (0)
- RE: Fair Enough - Isaak J. Garvey 17:04:41 06/07/17 (1)
- I do not agree with the author's conclusions - Charles Hansen 19:24:26 06/07/17 (0)
- RE: Sorry, wrong nomenclature - Isaak J. Garvey 10:13:51 06/07/17 (0)
- RE: Likely an ignorant comment by me. - ahendler 14:13:41 06/06/17 (1)
- RE: Likely an ignorant comment by me. - Isaak J. Garvey 14:34:26 06/06/17 (0)