In Reply to: Several problems digital has that analog seems to not have: posted by Ralph on April 17, 2017 at 13:18:04:
Ralph: Analog on playback is limited to 15-16 kHz, not 35 kHz.Digital brightness is gone and has been for years. (2) false things already.
The problems of analog are so large that no one serious in audio is using it. No classical recording labels, not Bob Ludwig, not anyone investigating (or producing) cutting-edge crossovers. In order to advance sound quality, XOs are going DSP.
Edits: 04/17/17 04/17/17
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Several problems digital has that analog seems to not have: - J. Phelan 15:35:59 04/17/17 (27)
- Revisionist history - E-Stat 06:56:34 04/19/17 (0)
- RE: "Analog on playback is limited to 15-16 kHz, not 35 kHz." FINALLY! - Ivan303 16:48:17 04/17/17 (0)
- RE: Several problems digital has that analog seems to not have: - Tre' 16:33:27 04/17/17 (24)
- We need to find out what... - mkuller 20:47:56 04/17/17 (0)
- RE: Several problems digital has that analog seems to not have: - J. Phelan 16:46:32 04/17/17 (22)
- This is incorrect! - Ralph 10:14:03 04/18/17 (0)
- RE: Several problems digital has that analog seems to not have: - J. Phelan 17:32:53 04/17/17 (19)
- RE: Several problems digital has that analog seems to not have: - Tre' 17:57:29 04/17/17 (18)
- RE: Several problems digital has that analog seems to not have: - morricab 07:59:36 04/18/17 (0)
- RE: Several problems digital has that analog seems to not have: - J. Phelan 18:07:20 04/17/17 (16)
- wrong again - Analog Scott 18:11:12 04/17/17 (15)
- He seems to have a way of doing that. nt - Ralph 10:15:21 04/18/17 (0)
- RE: wrong again - J. Phelan 18:17:41 04/17/17 (13)
- RE: wrong again - Analog Scott 20:50:29 04/17/17 (0)
- RE: wrong again - Tre' 18:31:32 04/17/17 (11)
- RE: wrong again - J. Phelan 19:10:54 04/17/17 (10)
- RE: wrong again - Tre' 07:31:03 04/18/17 (5)
- RE: wrong again - J. Phelan 11:22:51 04/18/17 (1)
- Perhaps you should read your own *references* more closely - E-Stat 07:24:11 04/19/17 (0)
- RE: wrong again - SpotcheckBilly12345 08:00:27 04/18/17 (2)
- Thanks! nt - Ralph 10:24:29 04/18/17 (0)
- That's good advice. Thanks. (nt) - Tre' 09:19:48 04/18/17 (0)
- RE: wrong again - Analog Scott 20:58:26 04/17/17 (3)
- RE: wrong again - J. Phelan 06:53:54 04/18/17 (2)
- Bwahahaha - E-Stat 05:48:00 04/19/17 (0)
- Who is Roger Sanders? - Analog Scott 06:58:21 04/18/17 (0)
- RE: "This one is right off Google"... - Ivan303 16:49:40 04/17/17 (0)