In Reply to: Blind testing assumes that one steps in the same river twice posted by Jay Buridan on November 7, 2016 at 14:46:05:
DBT as a means of eliminating bias effects is the gold standard in science. There has been a massive amount of research in the field of human hearing. DBTs work just fine in that field when done by actual scientists doing actual peer reviewed published research. IOW when it's done well, blind listening tests work just fine.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Complete nonsense - Analog Scott 13:31:31 11/19/16 (7)
- So, DBT audio judgement is more reliable than sighted? - Jay Buridan 19:38:40 11/19/16 (6)
- Heraclitus didn't have powerful statistical analytics. (NT) - Kal Rubinson 14:01:57 11/20/16 (0)
- RE: So, DBT audio judgement is more reliable than sighted? - Analog Scott 20:13:20 11/19/16 (4)
- RE: So, DBT audio judgement is more reliable than sighted? - Inmate51 08:47:31 01/06/17 (1)
- "The man acknowledges climate change" really? - Analog Scott 06:18:16 01/21/17 (0)
- RE: So, DBT audio judgement is more reliable than sighted? - John Atkinson 15:21:57 11/26/16 (1)
- RE: So, DBT audio judgement is more reliable than sighted? - Analog Scott 18:05:18 11/26/16 (0)