In Reply to: But you must at least admit... posted by Jim Austin on September 22, 2005 at 05:33:23:
JGH didn't say "pretty much the same thing". If you had said the same thing as JGH, I would have no beef with you. There are two critical differences:1) He actually took the trouble to try the tweak under question.
2) He didn't make a flat-out pronouncement as to whether the thing could work or not.
I'm still waiting to hear why you think your flat-out pronouncements should be accepted as infallible, both by Atkinson and by Stereophile readers. You have already admitted that other persons with greater qualifications might not agree with your views.
I'd also be willing to bet that your views have changed over time. If that assumption proves to be true, please explain why we should accept your 2005 beliefs instead of your 2001 beliefs or your 2008 beliefs.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- 100% Wrong - Charles Hansen 09:58:33 09/22/05 (14)
- I'll take this one - John Atkinson 14:16:40 09/22/05 (2)
- A few problems - Charles Hansen 16:26:40 09/22/05 (0)
- Re: I'll take this one - bjh 14:39:26 09/22/05 (0)
- I disagree - Jim Austin 11:49:21 09/22/05 (10)
- Bad Science and Arrogance - Charles Hansen 12:29:35 09/22/05 (9)
- Getting Bored - Jim Austin 12:44:29 09/22/05 (8)
- Re: Getting Bored - john curl 18:20:35 09/23/05 (0)
- So you were wrong before... - Charles Hansen 14:27:38 09/22/05 (6)
- Re: So you were wrong before... - Wendell Narrod 11:17:27 09/23/05 (5)
- I find Mr. Hansen's views both cogent and persuasive. - vacuous 11:50:18 09/23/05 (3)
- Re: I find Mr. Hansen's views both cogent and persuasive. - Wendell Narrod 12:49:14 09/23/05 (2)
- Re: I find Mr. Hansen's views both cogent and persuasive. - John Atkinson 06:56:45 09/24/05 (1)
- Re: I find Mr. Hansen's views both cogent and persuasive. - john curl 14:24:35 09/23/05 (0)
- Re: So you were wrong before... - john curl 11:28:17 09/23/05 (0)