In Reply to: Re: SS Vs.Tube Xover posted by kman9@cox.net on November 27, 2006 at 06:49:34:
Hi kman,Should be very niice! :-))
Yes, yours sounds like a good XO setup. How have you setup the XM-26 ... 18dB on the bass and 12dB on the mids/ribbons?
And with the XM-9, you're currently running sub LP @ 50Hz, with a 24dB slope ... and running the bass panels full range? If your alternative with the XM-9 is to have 24dB HP @ 50 Hz for the bass panels, I'm not surprised running them full range sounds better. But I have a feeling (because I'm researching subs for my IIIAs right now! :-)) ) that rolling off the bass panels with a 12dB slope at about 70Hz would probably be a good thing.
There is another combo you could try with your XM-9 and XM-26. Given the XM-9 only supports symmetric slopes ... use it for the external bass/mid XO (ie. this changes the bass LP slope from 18dB to 12dB). The III had a 12dB bass LP slope and a friend of mine with IIIAs converted his to 12dB ... and it sounds pretty damn good! :-))
You should use bass LP 12dB @ 290Hz and mid/ribbon HP at 500Hz.
Then use the XM-26 for the sub/bass panel XO ... 24dB @ 50 or 60Hz for the sub LP and a 12dB slope for the bass HP @ 70 or 80Hz.
Just a suggestion! :-))
Regards,
andy
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: SS Vs.Tube Xover - andyr 12:04:02 11/27/06 (2)
- Re: SS Vs.Tube Xover - kman9@cox.net 23:35:15 11/27/06 (1)
- Re: SS Vs.Tube Xover - andyr 00:28:03 11/28/06 (0)