Vinyl Asylum

Welcome Licorice Pizza (LP) lovers! Setup guides and Vinyl FAQ.

Return to Vinyl Asylum


Message Sort: Post Order or Asylum Reverse Threaded

New pressings suck?

108.180.220.12

Posted on April 15, 2017 at 18:16:11
magiccarpetride
Audiophile

Posts: 1523
Joined: March 31, 2010
Yesterday I experienced a bit of a shock. I purchased a brand new, sealed LP "Abbey Road" by the Beatles. It is a 2012 180 gram pressing from the 2009 remastered source. The outer shrink wrap had a label "Made in Germany", which, to my mind, spells quality.

I washed the new LP, vacuumed it, rinsed it with distilled water, vacuumed again, and then sat down for a listen, expecting to be blown away. Hmmm, for some reason the LP sounds kind of dull. Muddy, murky. Yes, the bass is voluminous, deep and strong, but where is the sparkle?

OK, maybe I'm imagining things. I pulled my old scratchy Abbey Road copy, the one I bought many moons ago on a garage sale, simply for the iconic cover. I put that sorry old beater of an LP on, and my jaw dropped on the floor -- this old LP sounds so superior compared to the brand new remaster, that it is simply unreal! How can this be? The bass is much deeper, much stronger, the highs are crystal clear, the entire sound is so much livelier. Yes, the record is horribly scratched, was obviously badly abused in its previous life, but nevertheless it still sounds brilliant.

This made me wonder: is it perhaps true that all the good pressing plants are now history, that even in Germany one cannot get a decent LP pressed anymore? Or is this wimpy pale sound caused by the digital source -- the remaster used for cutting the LP is a digital remaster from 2009?

Any ideas?

 

Hide full thread outline!
    ...
RE: New pressings suck?, posted on April 15, 2017 at 19:40:29
jazzthusiast
Audiophile

Posts: 3078
Location: SE Texas
Joined: July 9, 2002
I recall the remastered stereos were sourced from digital masters & not well received by vinyl lovers at all. The mono box set that came out just a few yrs ago is a different story. It was remastered form the original analog mono master tapes & received high marks by vinyl enthusiasts. Of course, the mono set does not include Abbey Rd, Let It Be, or Yellow Submarine, since there were not orig mono mixes for those albums. Probably the best bet, if you'd like to acquire all the Beatles albums eventually is to obtain the "Blue Box" set, cat # BC-13, late 70s UK reissue of all the orig stereo albums plus "Rarities." I have that set for UK stereo mixes, orig yello & black label Parlophone & Apple (White album) for monos, & the mono box just b/c I couldn't resist. The late 70s UK reissues' sound quality is excellent & they are well regarded by most. The alternative is to seek out the ones you want one by one. 60s & 70s UK pressings are best. Track selections are not the same on US Capitol albums up to Revolver & SQ isn't the same as UK. Just my 2c.

Regards,
Jim
"If less is more, just think how much more more would be!" - Frasier Crane.
-----------------------------
Russco Studio Pro B/Syntec S220/Empire 2000E/3-Technics SL1210mkII/DL103R/Yam C-4 pre-Yam M-4 amp-KLH 5 spkrs-Outlaw sub

 

RE: New pressings suck?, posted on April 15, 2017 at 23:03:06
padreken
Audiophile

Posts: 8518
Location: San Diego
Joined: November 28, 2000
Strongly the 2nd the BC-13 box for the Beatles in stereo-this, the mono box and the German Horzu Magical Mystery gives you all the Fabs on vinyl you'll ever need, IMO.




 

Its not the pressing plants..., posted on April 16, 2017 at 02:54:29
EdAInWestOC
Audiophile

Posts: 6828
Location: Glen Burnie, MD USA
Joined: December 18, 2003
Most likely, the quality of the master tape has deteriorated. If you want pressings of old LPs that were mastered from analog stereo masters, there is a weakness. Each time the master tape is hung up on the playback deck and played back to cut another lacquer, the tape degrades slightly.

The use of the tape plus the age of the analog master makes for a master tape that becomes duller and loses the "reality" of the sound. If the master tape in question is digital, your have other issues. If the digital master was a copy of an analog master, the condition of the analog master when the digital copy was made is captured on the digital copy. Also, the digital master tape degrades over time too.

A digital tape can suffer from drop outs where the sound hits gaps. Tape playback is not perfect and the quality of the master tape is dependent on the type of tape used (some formulations age better than others) and how the tape is stored.

Many times a LP is cut from a copy of the original stereo master tape because the original master is not available to the mastering facility. Subsequent copies of a master tape sound duller too. Beatles master tapes are ones that are carefully guarded and it would seem that mastering by Abbey Road studios would indicate that they used the original master tapes.

I would check to see what they used in the mastering and then the LP can indicate what kind of condition the tape is in.

The original pressing of any LP is usually the best pressing available. There are exceptions so this is a guideline not a rule. If you can get to a used LP store and do some digging you can be rewarded. Before you go to the store, know what LPs you are looking for and do some research as to what the deadwax says on the original pressings.

Look for the oldest pressing of the LP you are looking for that is in good condition. Yes, I agree with you that the old scratchy sounding LPs have much better sound lying in the grooves. The trick is to find one in decent condition.

LPs can degrade over time but do not degrade the way tapes do. If a LP is taken care of and the playback gear is maintained well, the LP can last many lifetimes. Vinyl is a very resilient medium that last almost forever. If you find an original or something that was pressed from an original master tape many years ago, you will likely get rewarded with better sound.

Just remember that LP manufacturing is a business and the quality of the sound is not always an important factor in making another copy of the LP. Poor quality master tapes and amateur mastering can make for a lousy pressing. Finding a pressing that was made long ago can be a real ear opener.

Good luck finding a good quality original,
Ed
Life is analog...digital is just samples thereof

 

+1 nt , posted on April 16, 2017 at 05:38:09
jusbe
Audiophile

Posts: 5950
Location: North Island
Joined: April 4, 2000

Big J

"... only a very few individuals understand as yet that personal salvation is a contradiction in terms."


 

source, or the person 'doing' the remastering., posted on April 16, 2017 at 07:27:52
The original source is really no longer the best possible way to hear what was played. Mainly due to tape deterioration.
Then the idiots doing the remastering steps.
Too many try to be 'pure' and not alter what is on the tape at all. Which is NOT what the original person mastering the album did.
Some guys who do mastering are famous and desired.Like Robert Ludwig (Rolling Stones masterings), or Rudy Van Gelder (Jazz)
Those guys have been noted for doing really great work.

Well, SOME guys doing remastering are idiots. Not everyone knows how to do the job 'well'. Some folks think they are doing it right, when in fact they mess it up. Maybe they are trying hard to be 'true to the original' when they mess up.. Hard to say. Whatever the reason, it sounds bad.

 

RE: if you want a truly good copy of Abbey Road, posted on April 16, 2017 at 10:40:55
Search for a MoFi Abbey Road. 1/2 speed remaster. The one I mean in particular was remastered by Stan Ricker. The real plus here is the vinyl formula used on these pressings. it is some of the quietest vinyl ever produced.

These remasters are noted for a bit more bass, but also extended and clean high frequencies as well as a better sense of articulation of detail overall in combination with a super quiet background.

-Steve

 

RE: New pressings suck?, posted on April 16, 2017 at 12:17:37
Sondek
Audiophile

Posts: 9632
Location: Fort Worth
Joined: May 17, 2000
Contributor
  Since:
April 5, 2002
Agreed. The UK and US issued blue boxes are identical except that the US versions are serial numbered and the Rarities disc is different. Otherwise, all else the same. All the LPs, with exception of Rarities, were all pressed in the same UK plant at the same time. Excellent sounding. Glad I tracked down my box years ago. It's my go to copies when I wanna hear some Beatles.

 

The Mofi was cut bright...., posted on April 16, 2017 at 20:39:29
vinyl1
Audiophile

Posts: 3948
Joined: October 3, 2001
.....and deliberately so. Stan admitted he was not entirely happy with the tonal balance that the owner of Mofi requested him to create.

 

RE: have you heard it?, posted on April 16, 2017 at 20:53:12
I have several different pressings. UK, French, US and the MoFi. My preference is the MoFi.

-Steve

 

Agree! (nt), posted on April 16, 2017 at 21:19:02
Crazy Dave
Audiophile

Posts: 14371
Location: East Coast
Joined: October 4, 2001

 

A Japanese pressing will give the MoFi a run for it's money. /nt, posted on April 17, 2017 at 04:29:43
Biff
Audiophile

Posts: 7527
Location: Portland, Oregon
Joined: January 27, 2002

 

Agreed..., posted on April 17, 2017 at 04:29:45
EdAInWestOC
Audiophile

Posts: 6828
Location: Glen Burnie, MD USA
Joined: December 18, 2003
I also have several pressings of Abbey Road. My original 1st UK pressing is the best sonically but it is not in great condition. You can still hear the superior sonics but its not a great listen with the poor condition of the LP.

The MoFi is a very good pressing. I don't know how it could be considered a bright pressing. It is not bright IMO. I currently have the UK 1st pressing, the UK blue box pressing and the MoFi. I believe that I have another in a pile of used LPs I have not gone through yet but I cannot say which pressing it is or how it sounds.

Ed
Life is analog...digital is just samples thereof

 

The MoFi is a Japanese pressing...nt, posted on April 17, 2017 at 04:33:57
EdAInWestOC
Audiophile

Posts: 6828
Location: Glen Burnie, MD USA
Joined: December 18, 2003
nt
Life is analog...digital is just samples thereof

 

I realize that., posted on April 17, 2017 at 05:04:27
Biff
Audiophile

Posts: 7527
Location: Portland, Oregon
Joined: January 27, 2002
I meant a Japanese pressing other than MoFi. I have one on Apple that sounds superb.

 

RE: I realize that., posted on April 17, 2017 at 06:17:41
Monchi
Audiophile

Posts: 576
Location: Cork, Ireland
Joined: June 4, 2007
This is the one I have: https://www.discogs.com/The-Beatles-Abbey-Road/release/2298243

It is a reissue but uses a U.K. remastering.

 

RE: New pressings suck?, posted on April 17, 2017 at 06:28:01
Jeffrey Lee
Audiophile

Posts: 708
Location: Louisville
Joined: September 24, 2002
Not all new pressings suck but the Beatles stereo remasters were not well-received, especially by discerning listeners, for all of the reasons you've described.

I assume your scratched copy is a US pressing and some US pressings are readily available for not a lot of money. Not all, but some. Used shops in Louisville generally have a handful of 1970s-era reissues with the orange or plum Capitol labels for $10-$15.

BUT there are a lot of US pressings, so you'll need to figure out which one is yours and proceed from there. You can do that on the linked page. If you're not familiar with Discogs, first check the left-hand column to make sure you're looking at the LP format and then the column that specifies country of origin.

You apparently really like yours so why not find a better copy?

 

That's the one. /nt, posted on April 17, 2017 at 06:37:00
Biff
Audiophile

Posts: 7527
Location: Portland, Oregon
Joined: January 27, 2002

 

RE: New pressings suck?, posted on April 17, 2017 at 07:37:35
jazzthusiast
Audiophile

Posts: 3078
Location: SE Texas
Joined: July 9, 2002
The US Beatles albums on the late 70s Capitol purple label with large logo at top have very good SQ, remastered by excellent engineers, e.g., Gene Thomspon ("Gene" in deadwax), Wally Traugott ("Wally," "Wly"), Ken Perry ("KP"), et al, & I think are most often preferred for SQ to orig black/rainbow caps & usually reasonable priced, as you say, $10-15.
"If less is more, just think how much more more would be!" - Frasier Crane.
-----------------------------
Russco Studio Pro B/Syntec S220/Empire 2000E/3-Technics SL1210mkII/DL103R/Yam C-4 pre-Yam M-4 amp-KLH 5 spkrs-Outlaw sub

 

RE: Toshiba..?, posted on April 17, 2017 at 09:43:35
I believe, if my hazy memory hsn't failed, that EMI and Toshiba were somewhat familial when it came to Japanese pressings of Beatles albums.

edit: add
I have a Japanese pressing of The White Album (The Beatles). In the fine print it says Toshiba. This pressing is from the mid to late 1970's. It is a fine pressing. I also have a MOFI of The White Album. I prefer the MOFI to every other pressing of that album I have, mainly, because the mastering engineer (Stan Ricker) has successfully endeavored to fix several poorly engineered tracks on the original master tapes. (note: That album was recorded at more than one recording studio, --not Abbey Road-- and neither Geo. Martin or Geoff Emerick did any work on it.)

-Steve

 

RE: That's the one. /nt, posted on April 17, 2017 at 15:36:21
Monchi
Audiophile

Posts: 576
Location: Cork, Ireland
Joined: June 4, 2007
That is the one I have too!

 

It's a good one, eh?, posted on April 18, 2017 at 05:52:28
Biff
Audiophile

Posts: 7527
Location: Portland, Oregon
Joined: January 27, 2002
I like the way it sounds. Punchy.

 

RE: Not always but, posted on April 18, 2017 at 07:04:17
ydavid
Audiophile

Posts: 194
Joined: December 14, 2005
finding a normal production (not necessarily first pressing) that is in near mint condition will usually beat the new pressing hands down and it costs a lot less than the 180g rip offs. New pressings often sound dark and closed in comparison. But this is not always the case. Sometimes you will buy a new pressing that will sound fantastic. I always look for a good near mint first or second pressing. Unless it is a rare record, it costs less and sounds better to me than 180g new pressing.

 

+1 on the purple large logo label, posted on April 18, 2017 at 07:26:58
Biff
Audiophile

Posts: 7527
Location: Portland, Oregon
Joined: January 27, 2002
I have several of those and they sound good.

 

ditto nt, posted on April 24, 2017 at 20:49:29
audio_d
Audiophile

Posts: 215
Joined: March 2, 2008
nt

 

RE: New pressings suck?, posted on April 24, 2017 at 21:36:32
gordguide
Audiophile

Posts: 302
Joined: January 20, 2002
Old pressings also sucked. Nothing new; it's item-specific if you get a good pressing or not.

It should be noted, however, that ordinary pressings almost always contain a certain amount of re-cycled vinyl. Due to the nature of the material, two things are worth mentioning.

One, pure vinyl melts reasonably well, while recycled vinyl always retains a certain structure. It cannot "smooth out" the same way, and always adds noise to the pressing.

Second, for this reason, there is a limit to how much recycled vinyl that can be added to a stock. Not every pressing plant follows the same limits, so some plants make better "ordinary" records than others.

Virgin vinyl will always produce better pressings, so it's worth seeking out. The vinyl quality and other factors (age of the stampers, for example) all hit the bottom line. And none of those factors, even if good, can help a bad master sound better.

 

Page processed in 0.037 seconds.