Critic's Corner

Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry.

Return to Critic's Corner


Message Sort: Post Order or Asylum Reverse Threaded

Stereophile May 2017 - Chord Electronics DAVE D/A processor - Hi-Res reproduction now an afterthought for a Hi-Rez DAC?

45.72.150.226

Posted on May 24, 2017 at 10:32:53
bjh
Audiophile

Posts: 18614
Location: Ontario
Joined: November 22, 2003
I would have though that the focus in the subjective evaluation of a high-end Hi-Res 2-Channel Audio DAC would be said DAC's performance reproducing Hi-Res Audio data (PCM and DSD) ... this particular player capable of (per manufacturer) PCM 44.1 to 768kHz - DSD64 to 512 Native.

But in subjective evaluation (Sound and Comparison sections) Atkinson talks of using DAVE while optimizing the dithering algorithms for a 32 bit master to Red Book transfer, and listening to 24/192 AIFF files ripped from 12" 45rpm singles. That seem to be just about it for Hi-Res PCM.

DSD is mentioned almost passingly as sort of toss in for "fairer comparison" (poor DAVE having apparently lost the MQA battle). In any case the coverage seems sparse in comparison the weight DSD routinely enjoys in modern hi-end DAC review these days - diplomatic enough?



Beyond that, unless I missed a phrase here or there, most everything else is 44.1/16 and MQA sourced material, the latter of which I'm unclear if even generally considered a bonafide Hi-Rez source.

Bit of a comedy in IMO.










 

Hide full thread outline!
    ...
He also didn't comment on the SQ of the headphone output..., posted on May 25, 2017 at 09:05:54
Ivan303
Audiophile

Posts: 48887
Location: Cadiere d'azur FRANCE - Santa Fe, NM
Joined: February 26, 2001
:-(




First they came for the dumb-asses
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a dumb-ass

 

Stereo-pile is enough info, posted on May 29, 2017 at 08:37:02
bare
Audiophile

Posts: 1879
Joined: April 14, 2009
to render whatever said as pointless drivel.
Gawd only knows how that Rag keeps surviving, decades past its expiry date.

 

Page processed in 0.028 seconds.